ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Effective Pre-Training Method and Its Compositional Intelligence for Image Captioning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Mask R-CNN for automatic recognition of teeth and caries in cone-beam computerized tomography.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Caps Captioning: A Modern Image Captioning Approach Based on Improved Capsule Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increase in the performance of deep learning models, the model parameter has increased exponentially. An increase in model parameters leads to an increase in computation and training time, i.e., an increase in training cost. To reduce the training cost, we propose Compositional Intelligence (CI). This is a reuse method that combines pre-trained models for different tasks. Since the CI uses a well-trained model, good performance and small training cost can be expected in the target task. We applied the CI to the Image Captioning task. Compared to using a trained feature extractor, the caption generator is usually trained from scratch. On the other hand, we pre-trained the Transformer model as a caption generator and applied CI, i.e., we used a pre-trained feature extractor and a pre-trained caption generator. To compare the training cost of the From Scratch model and the CI model, early stopping was applied during fine-tuning of the image captioning task. On the MS-COCO dataset, the vanilla image captioning model reduced training cost by 13.8% and improved performance by up to 3.2%, and the Object Relation Transformer model reduced training cost by 21.3%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.