Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591071›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Research on Coverage Optimization in a WSN Based on an Improved COOT Bird Algorithm.

Yihui Huang, Jing Zhang, Wei Wei, Tao Qin, Yuancheng Fan, Xuemei Luo, Jing Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yihui HuangElectrical Engineering College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4451-9651
Jing ZhangElectrical Engineering College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3732-7432
Wei WeiPower China Guizhou Electric Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550025, China.
Tao QinElectrical Engineering College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Yuancheng FanPower China Guizhou Engineering Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550001, China.
Xuemei LuoElectrical Engineering College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Jing YangElectrical Engineering College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6407-1276

Funding

NNSF of China (No.61640014), Industrial Project of Guizhou province (No. Qiankehe Zhicheng [2022]017, [2019] 2152), Innovation group of Guizhou Education Department (No. Qianjiaohe KY [2021]012), Science and Technology Fund of Guizhou Province (No. Qianke (No.61640014),(No. Qiankehe Zhicheng [2022]017, [2019] 2152), (No. Qianjiaohe KY [2021]012), (No. Qiankehe [2020]1Y266), CASE Library of IOT(KCALK201708), (No. 2015)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the problems of uneven distribution and low coverage of wireless sensor network (WSN) nodes in random deployment, a node coverage optimization strategy with an improved COOT bird algorithm (COOTCLCO) is proposed. Firstly, the chaotic tent map is used to initialize the population, increase the diversity of the population, and lay the foundation for the global search for the optimal solutions. Secondly, the Lévy flight strategy is used to perturb the individual positions to improve the search range of the population. Thirdly, Cauchy mutation and an opposition-based learning strategy are fused to perturb the optimal solutions to generate new solutions and enhance the ability of the algorithm to jump out of the local optimum. Finally, the COOTCLCO algorithm is applied to WSN coverage optimization problems. Simulation results show that COOTCLCO has a faster convergence speed and better search accuracy than several other typical algorithms on 23 benchmark test functions; meanwhile, the coverage rate of the COOTCLCO algorithm is increased by 9.654%, 13.888%, 6.188%, 5.39%, 1.31%, and 2.012% compared to particle swarm optimization (PSO), butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA), seagull optimization algorithm (SOA), whale optimization algorithm (WOA), Harris hawks optimization (HHO), and bald eagle search (BES), respectively. This means that in terms of coverage optimization effect, COOTCLCO can obtain a higher coverage rate compared to these algorithms. The experimental results demonstrate that COOTCLCO can effectively improve the coverage rate of sensor nodes and improve the distribution of nodes in WSN coverage optimization problems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationWireless TechnologyData Collectionchaotic tent mapCOOT bird optimization algorithmcoverage optimizationLévy flightopposition-based learningwireless sensor networks

Identifiers

PMID35591071
PMCPMC9105145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.