Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35590991›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Correction Model for Metal Oxide Sensor Drift Caused by Ambient Temperature and Humidity.

Abdulnasser Nabil Abdullah, Kamarulzaman Kamarudin, Latifah Munirah Kamarudin, Abdul Hamid Adom, Syed Muhammad Mamduh, Zaffry Hadi Mohd Juffry, Victor Hernandez Bennetts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radon Exposure Assessment: IoT-Embedded Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reproducibility and Repeatability Tests on (SnTiNb)OSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdulnasser Nabil AbdullahFaculty of Electrical Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Malaysia.
Kamarulzaman KamarudinFaculty of Electrical Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-7764-0821
Latifah Munirah KamarudinFaculty of Electrical Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2547-3934
Abdul Hamid AdomFaculty of Electrical Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Malaysia.
Syed Muhammad MamduhFaculty of Electrical Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3557-2204
Zaffry Hadi Mohd JuffryFaculty of Electrical Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6012-8810
Victor Hernandez BennettsB3 Consulting Group, 703 61 Örebro, Sweden.

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education 9002-00094/9028-00002Ministry of Higher Education FRGS/1/2018/TK04/UNIMAP/02/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, Metal oxide (MOX) gas sensors have been commercially available and used in various applications such as the Smart City, gas monitoring, and safety due to advantages such as high sensitivity, a high detection range, fast reaction time, and cost-effectiveness. However, several factors affect the sensing ability of MOX gas sensors. This article presents the results of a study on the cross-sensitivity of MOX gas sensors toward ambient temperature and humidity. A gas sensor array consisting of temperature and humidity sensors and four different MOX gas sensors (MiCS-5524, GM-402B, GM-502B, and MiCS-6814) was developed. The sensors were subjected to various relative gas concentrations, temperatures (from 16 °C to 30 °C), and humidity levels (from 75% to 45%), representing a typical indoor environment. The results proved that the gas sensor responses were significantly affected by the temperature and humidity. The increased temperature and humidity levels led to a decreased response for all sensors, except for MiCS-6814, which showed the opposite response. Hence, this work proposed regression models for each sensor, which can correct the gas sensor response drift caused by the ambient temperature and humidity variations. The models were validated, and the standard deviations of the corrected sensor response were found to be 1.66 kΩ, 13.17 kΩ, 29.67 kΩ, and 0.12 kΩ, respectively. These values are much smaller compared to the raw sensor response (i.e., 18.22, 24.33 kΩ, 95.18 kΩ, and 2.99 kΩ), indicating that the model provided a more stable output and minimised the drift. Overall, the results also proved that the models can be used for MOX gas sensors employed in the training process, as well as for other sets of gas sensors.

Indexed as

OxidesHumidityTemperatureOxides3D linear regressioncross-sensitivitydrift correctionhumidityMOX sensorstemperature

Identifiers

PMID35590991
PMCPMC9101743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.