Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35590866›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparison of Electrodermal Activity from Multiple Body Locations Based on Standard EDA Indices' Quality and Robustness against Motion Artifact.

Md-Billal Hossain, Youngsun Kong, Hugo F Posada-Quintero, Ki H Chon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06782360 (CAMSAN), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06782360 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

CAMSAN: Cognitive Augmentation Via Multimodal Sensing and Auricular Neurostimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorOpenBCIRan2025 to 2026Enrolled45ConditionsHealthy, Cognitive Change, Effects of External Neurostimulation on CognitionArmsActive Neurostimulation, Sham Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Could electrodermal activity detect emotions soon?Journal of electrical bioimpedance · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sympathetic Arousal Detection in Horses Using Electrodermal Activity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Md-Billal HossainDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2344-8321
Youngsun KongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5409-3888
Hugo F Posada-QuinteroDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4514-4772
Ki H ChonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4422-4837
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

Office of Naval Research N00014-21-1-2255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most traditional sites for electrodermal activity (EDA) data collection, palmar locations such as fingers or palms, are not usually recommended for ambulatory monitoring given that subjects have to use their hands regularly during their daily activities, and therefore, alternative sites are often sought for EDA data collection. In this study, we collected EDA signals (

Indexed as

ArtifactsGalvanic Skin ResponseData CollectionFootHumansMaleMotioncognitive stresselectrodermal activitySCRstatistical test

Identifiers

PMID35590866
PMCPMC9104297
OpenAlexW4224310662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.