ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Segmentation Performance Comparison Considering Regional Characteristics in Chest X-ray Using Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Binary Classification of Pneumonia in Chest X-Ray Images Using Modified Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- NCT-CXR: Enhancing Pulmonary Abnormality Segmentation on Chest X-Rays Using Improved Coordinate Geometric Transformations.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Image Segmentation Method Based on Multi-Scale Feature Fusion and Sequence Relationship Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automatic Extraction of Muscle Parameters with Attention UNet in Ultrasonography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chest radiography is one of the most widely used diagnostic methods in hospitals, but it is difficult to read clearly because several human organ tissues and bones overlap. Therefore, various image processing and rib segmentation methods have been proposed to focus on the desired target. However, it is challenging to segment ribs elaborately using deep learning because they cannot reflect the characteristics of each region. Identifying which region has specific characteristics vulnerable to deep learning is an essential indicator of developing segmentation methods in medical imaging. Therefore, it is necessary to compare the deep learning performance differences based on regional characteristics. This study compares the differences in deep learning performance based on the rib region to verify whether deep learning reflects the characteristics of each part and to demonstrate why this regional performance difference has occurred. We utilized 195 normal chest X-ray datasets with data augmentation for learning and 5-fold cross-validation. To compare segmentation performance, the rib image was divided vertically and horizontally based on the spine, clavicle, heart, and lower organs, which are characteristic indicators of the baseline chest X-ray. Resultingly, we found that the deep learning model showed a 6-7% difference in the segmentation performance depending on the regional characteristics of the rib. We verified that the performance differences in each region cannot be ignored. This study will enable a more precise segmentation of the ribs and the development of practical deep learning algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.