Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35590797›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Evaluation of Different Landslide Susceptibility Models for a Local Scale in the Chitral District, Northern Pakistan.

Bilal Aslam, Ahsen Maqsoom, Umer Khalil, Omid Ghorbanzadeh, Thomas Blaschke, Danish Farooq, Rana Faisal Tufail, Salman Ali Suhail, Pedram Ghamisi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Bilal AslamDepartment of Earth Sciences, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7308-5285
Ahsen MaqsoomDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3745-516X
Umer KhalilDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-1095-3169
Omid GhorbanzadehInstitute of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence (IARAI), Landstraßer Hauptstraße 5, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9664-8770
Thomas BlaschkeDepartment of Geoinformatics-Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1860-8458
Danish FarooqDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3403-7744
Rana Faisal TufailDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan.
Salman Ali SuhailDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Lahore (UOL), Lahore 54590, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6384-9736
Pedram GhamisiInstitute of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence (IARAI), Landstraßer Hauptstraße 5, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1203-741X
COMSATS University Islamabad · PKAustrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence · ATQuaid-i-Azam University · PKUniversity of Lahore · PKUniversity of Salzburg · AT

Funding

Institute of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence (IARAI) GmbH ATU74131236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work evaluates the performance of three machine learning (ML) techniques, namely logistic regression (LGR), linear regression (LR), and support vector machines (SVM), and two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, namely analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), for mapping landslide susceptibility in the Chitral district, northern Pakistan. Moreover, we create landslide inventory maps from LANDSAT-8 satellite images through the change vector analysis (CVA) change detection method. The change detection yields more than 500 landslide spots. After some manual post-processing correction, the landslide inventory spots are randomly split into two sets with a 70/30 ratio for training and validating the performance of the ML techniques. Sixteen topographical, hydrological, and geological landslide-related factors of the study area are prepared as GIS layers. They are used to produce landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) with weighted overlay techniques using different weights of landslide-related factors. The accuracy assessment shows that the ML techniques outperform the MCDM methods, while SVM yields the highest accuracy of 88% for the resulting LSM.

Indexed as

LandslidesGeographic Information SystemsLogistic ModelsPakistanSupport Vector Machineanalytical hierarchy process (AHP)LANDSAT-8landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs)linear regression (LR)logistic regression (LGR)machine learning (ML) techniquessupport vector machines (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID35590797
PMCPMC9101762
OpenAlexW4224303230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.