Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35590396›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2022

Microbiomes of the Sydney Rock Oyster are acquired through both vertical and horizontal transmission.

Andrea Unzueta-Martínez, Elliot Scanes, Laura M Parker, Pauline M Ross, Wayne O'Connor, Jennifer L Bowen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cross-talk and mutual shaping between the immune system and the microbiota during an oyster's life.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea Unzueta-MartínezDepartment of Marine and Environmental Science, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA, 01908, USA. andrea_unzuetamartinez@fas.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1521-6763
Elliot ScanesSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Laura M ParkerSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Pauline M RossSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Wayne O'ConnorNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Port Stephens Fisheries Institute, Taylors Beach, NSW, 2316, Australia.
Jennifer L BowenDepartment of Marine and Environmental Science, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA, 01908, USA.
Northeastern University · USNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

National Science Foundation 1451070National Science Foundation 1938052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe term holobiont is widely accepted to describe animal hosts and their associated microorganisms. The genomes of all that the holobiont encompasses, are termed the hologenome and it has been proposed as a unit of selection in evolution. To demonstrate that natural selection acts on the hologenome, a significant portion of the associated microbial genomes should be transferred between generations. Using the Sydney Rock Oyster (Saccostrea glomerata) as a model, we tested if the microbes of this broadcast spawning species could be passed down to the next generation by conducting single parent crosses and tracking the microbiome from parent to offspring and throughout early larval stages using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. From each cross, we sampled adult tissues (mantle, gill, stomach, gonad, eggs or sperm), larvae (D-veliger, umbo, eyed pediveliger, and spat), and the surrounding environment (water and algae feed) for microbial community analysis.

resultsWe found that each larval stage has a distinct microbiome that is partially influenced by their parental microbiome, particularly the maternal egg microbiome. We also demonstrate the presence of core microbes that are consistent across all families, persist throughout early life stages (from eggs to spat), and are not detected in the microbiomes of the surrounding environment. In addition to the core microbiomes that span all life cycle stages, there is also evidence of environmentally acquired microbial communities, with earlier larval stages (D-veliger and umbo), more influenced by seawater microbiomes, and later larval stages (eyed pediveliger and spat) dominated by microbial members that are specific to oysters and not detected in the surrounding environment.

conclusionOur study characterized the succession of oyster larvae microbiomes from gametes to spat and tracked selected members that persisted across multiple life stages. Overall our findings suggest that both horizontal and vertical transmission routes are possible for the complex microbial communities associated with a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. We demonstrate that not all members of oyster-associated microbiomes are governed by the same ecological dynamics, which is critical for determining what constitutes a hologenome.

Indexed as

Animal microbiomesHolobiontHorizontal transmissionMicrobiome transmissionOyster larvae microbiomesSydney Rock OysterSymbiosisVertical transmission

Identifiers

PMID35590396
PMCPMC9118846
OpenAlexW4280517637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.