Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35590319›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2022

A high-starch vs. high-fibre diet: effects on the gut environment of the different intestinal compartments of the horse digestive tract.

Federica Raspa, Ingrid Vervuert, Maria Teresa Capucchio, Elena Colombino, Domenico Bergero, Claudio Forte, Martina Greppi, Laura Cavallarin, Marzia Giribaldi, Sara Antoniazzi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Exploring the Effect of GastrointestinalAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Veterinary medicine and science · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Federica RaspaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Ingrid VervuertFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig University, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Maria Teresa CapucchioDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Elena ColombinoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Domenico BergeroDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Claudio ForteDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Martina GreppiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Laura CavallarinISPA-CNR, Institute of Sciences of Food Production, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Marzia GiribaldiISPA-CNR, Institute of Sciences of Food Production, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Sara AntoniazziISPA-CNR, Institute of Sciences of Food Production, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Damiano CavalliniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
Ermenegildo ValvassoriPublic veterinary service, ASL TO5, 10023, Chieri, Italy.
Emanuela ValleDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy. emanuela.valle@unito.it.
University of Turin · ITInstitute of Sciences of Food Production · ITLeipzig University · DEUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHorses are often fed high amounts of starch in their diets despite the well-established benefits of a fibre-based diet to promote gut health and animal welfare. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of two different diets - one based on high amounts of starch (HS) vs. one base on high amounts of fibre (HF) - on specific parameters of the gut environment across different intestinal compartments of the horse digestive tract. To this end differences in the gastrointestinal environment between HS vs. HF fed horses were assessed in terms of dry matter, organic matter and ash content; the particle size distribution and volatile fatty acid composition were also investigated.

resultsNineteen Bardigiano horses of 14.3 ± 0.7 months of age and destined to slaughter were divided into two group pens - one fed with high amounts of starch (HS; n = 9; 43% hay plus 57% starch-rich pelleted feed); vs. fed with high amounts of fibre (HF; n = 10; 70% hay plus 30% fibre-rich pelleted feed). Horses fed HS diet presented a higher dry matter content in the right dorsal colon. Moreover, they showed a higher organic matter and ash content in the sternal flexure, pelvic flexure, right dorsal colon and rectum. In these latter intestinal compartments, horses fed a HS diet also showed a higher proportion of particles retained on an 8 mm sieve and a higher proportion of particles that washed through the finest sieve (< 1 mm). Moreover, the total amounts of volatile fatty acids as well as valeric acid were found to be significantly higher in horses fed the HS vs. HF diet.

conclusionsA high-starch diet causes significant changes in the horse gut environment. We observed an increase in the dry matter content in the right dorsal colon, as well as reduced particle sizes and an increase in the production of valeric acid in all the gut compartments studied. High-starch diets should be avoided in favour of fibre-based diets with the goal of safeguarding gut health in horses.

Indexed as

Animal FeedStarchAnimalsDietDietary FiberDigestionFatty Acids, VolatileGastrointestinal TractHorsesDietary FiberFatty Acids, VolatileStarchGut environmentHorseIntestinal compartmentsParticle sizeVolatile fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID35590319
PMCPMC9118577
OpenAlexW4280518994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.