Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35590265›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Parents' awareness and perceptions of the Change4Life 100 cal snack campaign, and perceived impact on snack consumption by children under 11 years.

Rhiannon E Day, Gemma Bridge, Kate Austin, Hannah Ensaff, Meaghan S Christian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rhiannon E DaySchool of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, CL615A, City Campus, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
Gemma Bridge, Leeds, UK. glbridge1@hotmail.co.uk.
Kate AustinSchool of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, CL615A, City Campus, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
Hannah EnsaffNutritional Sciences and Epidemiology, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4582-5244
Meaghan S ChristianDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics & Food, Monash University, Be Active Sleep Eat (BASE) Facility, Level 1, 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Leeds Beckett University · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood obesity is a pertinent public health problem in the UK. Consumption of free sugars has been associated with the development of obesity. In 2018, the Change 4Life (C4L) 100 cal snack campaign was launched with the slogan '100 calorie snacks, two a day max', aiming to encourage parents to choose lower sugar, fat and calorie snacks for their children. This study aimed to examine how the campaign has been perceived by parents.

methodsAn online survey was developed to explore parent awareness, perceptions and understanding of the C4L 100 cal snack campaign. Respondents were recruited via Leeds City Council, posters displayed at primary schools and children's centres across Leeds and via social media. Paper surveys were also shared with voluntarily led playgroups. Survey data was analysed using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis was performed on open text responses.

resultsThree hundred forty-two 342 respondents completed the survey. Just over half of the respondents had come across the campaign, most seeing the leaflet or a television advert. Over two-thirds of respondents 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' that the campaign caught their attention. A similar proportion 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' that the campaign informed them about 100 cal snacks and just over a half thought it was memorable. Most respondents used positive language to describe the campaign, but there was no clear consensus of a perceived positive impact on healthier snack purchasing, nor preparing more 100 cal snacks at home. Respondents provided examples of how the campaign could be improved to positively impact eating behaviours: better publicity and information delivery; healthier snack examples made more visible; improved nutritional labelling and access to healthier products in supermarkets (availability, promotion, display, choice).

conclusionsThe C4L 100 cal snack campaign was perceived positively by parents and carers, with many agreeing that the campaign was informative and memorable. However, there was no agreement in terms of the parents reporting an impact of the campaign on behaviour change and healthier snack habits. Future social marketing campaigns could be improved through more formal pilot testing to assess the understanding and acceptance of the campaign amongst the target audience.

Indexed as

Pediatric ObesitySnacksChildEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorHumansParentsChildhoodInterventionNutritionObesityPublic healthSnacking

Identifiers

PMID35590265
PMCPMC9118772
OpenAlexW4280493875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.