Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35590124›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

Utility values and its time to deterioration in breast cancer patients after diagnosis and during treatments.

Rana El Haidari, Amelie Anota, Tienhan S Dabakuyo-Yonli, Francis Guillemin, Thierry Conroy, Michel Velten, Damien Jolly, Sylvain Causeret, Jean Cuisenier, Olivier Graesslin and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Rana El HaidariINSERM (French Institut of Health and Medical Research), UMR1098 (Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique), EFS BFC (Etablissement Français du Sang Bourgogne Franche-Comté), University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, 25000, Besançon, France. ranahaidari14@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1752-5180
Amelie AnotaBiostatistics Unit, Department of Clinical Research and Innovation & Department of Human and Social Sciences, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Tienhan S Dabakuyo-YonliFrench National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Montpellier, France.
Francis GuilleminFrench National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Montpellier, France.
Thierry ConroyInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Medical Oncology Department, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Michel VeltenFrench National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Montpellier, France.
Damien JollyFrench National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Montpellier, France.
Sylvain CauseretSurgery Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Jean CuisenierSurgery Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Olivier GraesslinGynecological and Obstetric Department, Institut Mère Enfant, University Hospital of Reims, URCA (Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne), Reims, France.
Linda Abou AbbasFaculty of Medical Sciences, Neuroscience Research Center, Lebanese university, Beirut, 1001, Lebanon.
Virginie NerichBiostatistics Unit, Department of Clinical Research and Innovation & Department of Human and Social Sciences, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Centre Georges François Leclerc · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine · FRInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FRLebanese University · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential effects of breast cancer (BC) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) should be considered in clinical and policy decision-making, as the economic burden of BC management is currently assessed. In the last decades, time-to-HRQoL score deterioration (TTD) has been proposed as an approach to the analysis of longitudinal HRQoL in oncology. The main objectives of the current study were to investigate the evolution of the utility values in BC patients after diagnosis and during follow-ups and to evaluate the TTD in utility values among women in all stages of BC.

methodsHealth-state utility values (HSUV) were assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level at diagnosis, at the end of the first hospitalization and 3 and 6 months after the first hospitalization. For a given baseline score, HSUV was considered to have deteriorated if this score decreased by ≥ 0.08 points of the EQ-5D utility index score and ≥ 7 points of the EQ visual analogue scale. TTD curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimation method.

resultsOverall 381 patients were enrolled between February 2006 and February 2008. The highest proportions of respondents at the baseline and all follow-ups reporting some and extreme problems were in pain discomfort and anxiety/depression dimensions; more than 80% of patients experienced a deterioration in EQ-5D utility index score and EQ VAS score with a median TTD of 3.15 months and 6.24 Months, respectively.

conclusionsBC patients undergoing therapy need psychological support to cope with their discomfort, pain, depression, anxiety, and fear during the process of diagnosis and treatment to improve their QoL.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsQuality of LifeFemaleHealth StatusHumansPainSurveys and QuestionnairesVisual Analog ScaleBreast cancerHealth-state utility valuesTime to deterioration

Identifiers

PMID35590124
OpenAlexW4280488280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.