ArticleEye (London, England)2023
Three-year follow-up of accelerated versus standard corneal cross-linking in paediatric Keratoconus.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paediatric Keratoconus: An ERN-EYE Clinical Consensus Statement on Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up Care.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Five-year corneal cross-linking outcomes: A Save Sight Keratoconus Registry Study.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStandard corneal collagen cross-linking (S-CXL) is an effective treatment to arrest Keratoconus (KC) progression in children. Less is known on the long-term efficacy of accelerated CXL (A-CXL) in paediatric populations.
methodsA historical cohort analysis of paediatric patients (≤18 years) with KC who underwent S-CXL and A-CXL at two tertiary referral centres in Israel between 2010-2017. Preoperative and 3-year postoperative evaluation included changes in visual acuity (best spectacle corrected [BSCVA]) and uncorrected [UCVA]), refractive errors, and keratometric data.
resultsNinety-three eyes of 93 patients were analysed (A-CXL: n = 39; S-CXL: n = 54). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Both groups showed a significant improvement in visual acuity compared to baseline (S-CXL: 0.810-0.602 LogMAR UCVA; A-CXL: 0.890-0.306 LogMAR UCVA, p < 0.05 for both). Improvement in BSCVA and UCVA following A-CXL was non-inferior to S-CXL (< ± 0.2 LogMAR). Kmax decreased by a mean of 0.98 ± 5.56 dioptres following S-CXL (p = 0.02) and by 1.48 ± 8.4 dioptres following A-CXL (p = 0.015). Thinnest pachymetry decreased following both treatments (S-CXL: by 26.8 ± 40.7 µm, p = 0.001, A-CXL: by 10.2 ± 13.4 µm, p = 0.028), the difference between groups was within the non-inferiority margin (< ± 10 µm).
conclusionsPaediatric patients followed for three years after A-CXL showed improved visual function, reduced corneal astigmatism and Kmax, and decreased thinnest corneal thickness. A-CXL was non-inferior to S-CXL at three years in terms of best-corrected and uncorrected visual acuity, thinnest pachymetry, and astigmatism. For Kmax, non-inferiority could not be concluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.