ArticleJournal of applied genetics2022
DNA sequence features underlying large-scale duplications and deletions in human.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- SVCROWS: a user-defined tool for interpreting significant structural variants in heterogeneous datasets.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- MOV&RSim: computational modelling of cancer-specific variants and sequencing reads characteristics for realistic tumoral sample simulation.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Copy number variants (CNVs) may cover up to 12% of the whole genome and have substantial impact on phenotypes. We used 5867 duplications and 33,181 deletions available from the 1000 Genomes Project to characterise genomic regions vulnerable to CNV formation and to identify sequence features characteristic for those regions. The GC content for deletions was lower and for duplications was higher than for randomly selected regions. In regions flanking deletions and downstream of duplications, content was higher than in the random sequences, but upstream of duplication content was lower. In duplications and downstream of deletion regions, the percentage of low-complexity sequences was not different from the randomised data. In deletions and upstream of CNVs, it was higher, while for downstream of duplications, it was lower as compared to random sequences. The majority of CNVs intersected with genic regions - mainly with introns. GC content may be associated with CNV formation and CNVs, especially duplications are initiated in low-complexity regions. Moreover, CNVs located or overlapped with introns indicate their role in shaping intron variability. Genic CNV regions were enriched in many essential biological processes such as cell adhesion, synaptic transmission, transport, cytoskeleton organization, immune response and metabolic mechanisms, which indicates that these large-scaled variants play important biological roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.