ArticleCell and tissue banking2022
Comparative study of mouse adipose- and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in diabetic model with critical limb ischemia.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Innovative Delivery System of Oxygen-Releasing Nanospheres and Self-Healing Hydrogels Enhances the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this research is to compare the capabilities of Adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) in the treatment of diabetic male mice with CLI model. Supernatants were collected from C57BL/6 mice isolated AT-MSCs and BM-MSCs, afterward their effects on human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVEC) migration potential were evaluated. Diabetes mellitus type 1 was induced by streptozotocin injection. Diabetic mice with CLI model were divided into three groups and injected with AT-MSCs, BM-MSCs, or PBS then the efficacy of them was assessed. Survival of MSCs was analysed by SRY-specific gene. The conditioned medium of AT-MSCs and BM-MSCs stimulated HUVECs migration and the donor cells were detected till 21 day in two groups. BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs improved significantly functional recovery and ischemia damage. Neovascularization in ischemic muscle was significantly higher in mice treated with AT-MSCs and BM-MSCs and they improved muscle regeneration. In vivo and in vitro findings show that AT-MSCs and BM-MSCs transplantation could be proposed as a promising therapy to promote angiogenesis and muscle regeneration through secretion of proangiogenic factors, cytokines and growth factors in diabetic mice with CLI model wherein blood supply is insufficient and disrupted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.