ArticleEye (London, England)2022
Outcome of intravitreal Avastin® injections in patients with macular oedema in Uganda: a cohort study.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Indications and outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab injection in a Community Eye Hospital, Nepal.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Compliance to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors for treatment of retinal diseases in Nigerians: a retrospective multicenter study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Intralesional Bevacizumab in Dermatology: Insights from a Systematic Review.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Review
- Retrospective Study of Diabetic Retinopathy and Macular Edema in Southern Part of Bangladesh.Journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab on diabetic macular oedema in an African population.Irish journal of medical science · 2023Article
- Effects of intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) monotherapy in central retinal vein occlusion in young subjects.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo determine the outcome of Intravitreal Avastin (IVA) injections in patients with Macular Oedema (MO) in Uganda.
methodsWe prospectively recruited patients presenting with MO at the Department of Ophthalmology of Mbarara University of Science and Technology in Southern Uganda from November 2018 to April 2019. We treated them with intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab (Avastin®) and followed them up for three consecutive months after the initial injection. We collected information on baseline clinical presentation and 3 month outcomes. We performed a Student's t-test to compare central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline and at 3 months after IVA injections. We performed linear regression to test for predictors of change in CMT and BCVA at 3 months.
resultsWe enroled 32 patients (35 eyes) of which 29 patients (32 eyes) completed the follow up. The mean age was 62.8 ± 11.8 years, and 53% were male. At 3 months after IVA, the mean CMT improved significantly from 426.90 ± 135.9 µm at baseline to 311.20 ± 134.80 µm (p = 0.0008). The mean BCVA improved from 0.70 ± 0.38 at baseline to 0.38 ± 0.36 logMAR units (p = 0.003). The improvement in CMT and BCVA were more marked in patients who had Diabetic ME compared to other causes. A high baseline CMT was a strong predictor of improvement in CMT at 3 months after IVA therapy. A worse baseline visual acuity was a predictor of improvement in vision at 3 months after IVA.
conclusionsIVA therapy results in anatomical and visual improvement at 3 months especially in patients with Diabetic MO. Having a high baseline CMT was a predictor of good CMT outcome at 3 months while a worse vision at baseline was a predictor of better visual outcome at 3 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.