Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35590022›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Genome-wide identification of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB) isolates retrieved from hospitalized patients in Bihar, India.

Namrata Kumari, Mukesh Kumar, Amit Katiyar, Abhay Kumar, Pallavi Priya, Bablu Kumar, Nihar Ranjan Biswas, Punit Kaur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales co-harboring blaAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Clinical and Molecular Profile of Carbapenem ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Namrata Kumari *Department of Microbiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, 800014, Bihar, India. nrainrai@gmail.com.
Mukesh Kumar *Department of Biophysics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Amit KatiyarBioinformatics Facility, Centralized Core Research Facility, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Abhay KumarDepartment of Microbiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, 800014, Bihar, India.
Pallavi PriyaDepartment of Microbiology, Mahavir Cancer Sansthan, Patna, 801505, Bihar, India.
Bablu KumarDepartment of Microbiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, 800014, Bihar, India.
Nihar Ranjan BiswasDepartment of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, 800014, Bihar, India.
Punit KaurDepartment of Biophysics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India. punitkaur1@hotmail.com.
Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INMahavir Cancer Institute and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates are becoming more common over the world, posing a severe public health danger, particularly in developing nations like India. Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB) infection has become a fast-expanding global threat with limited antibiotic choice and significant mortality. This study aimed to highlight the carbapenem-resistance among clinical isolates of hospital admitted patients in Bihar, India. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 101 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All GNB isolates were tested for their antimicrobial susceptibility using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Double disc synergy test / modified Hodge test (DDST/MHT) were used to detect carbapenemase production by these isolates. Subsequently, these isolates were evaluated for carbapenem-resistance genes using whole-genome sequencing method. The overall percentage of carbapenem-resistance among GNB was (17/101) 16.8%. The genomic analysis of antimicrobial-resistance (AMR) demonstrates a significantly high prevalence of bla

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCross-Sectional StudiesEscherichia coliHumansIndiaKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID35590022
PMCPMC9120164
OpenAlexW4280643149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.