Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35589977›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Insect vector manipulation by a plant virus and simulation modeling of its potential impact on crop infection.

Hyoseok Lee, Andrew P Stephanus, Trevor M Fowles, William M Wintermantel, John T Trumble, Robert L Gilbertson, Christian Nansen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hyoseok LeeDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. hyslee@ucdavis.edu.
Andrew P StephanusDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Trevor M FowlesDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
William M WintermantelUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Salinas, CA, 93905, USA.
John T TrumbleDepartment of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Robert L GilbertsonDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Christian NansenDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · USAgricultural Research Service · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is widespread evidence of plant viruses manipulating behavior of their insect vectors as a strategy to maximize infection of plants. Often, plant viruses and their insect vectors have multiple potential host plant species, and these may not overlap entirely. Moreover, insect vectors may not prefer plant species to which plant viruses are well-adapted. In such cases, can plant viruses manipulate their insect vectors to preferentially feed and oviposit on plant species, which are suitable for viral propagation but less suitable for themselves? To address this question, we conducted dual- and no-choice feeding studies (number and duration of probing events) and oviposition studies with non-viruliferous and viruliferous [carrying beet curly top virus (BCTV)] beet leafhoppers [Circulifer tenellus (Baker)] on three plant species: barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Barley is not a host of BCTV, whereas ribwort plantain and tomato are susceptible to BCTV infection and develop a symptomless infection and severe curly top symptoms, respectively. Ribwort plantain plants can be used to maintain beet leafhopper colonies for multiple generations (suitable), whereas tomato plants cannot be used to maintain beet leafhopper colonies (unsuitable). Based on dual- and no-choice experiments, we demonstrated that BCTV appears to manipulate probing preference and behavior by beet leafhoppers, whereas there was no significant difference in oviposition preference. Simulation modeling predicted that BCTV infection rates would to be higher in tomato fields with barley compared with ribwort plantain as a trap crop. Simulation model results supported the hypothesis that manipulation of probing preference and behavior may increase BCTV infection in tomato fields. Results presented were based on the BCTV-beet leafhopper pathosystem, but the approach taken (combination of experimental studies with complementary simulation modeling) is widely applicable and relevant to other insect-vectored plant pathogen systems involving multiple plant species.

Indexed as

Beta vulgarisGeminiviridaeHemipteraPlant VirusesAnimalsFemaleInsect VectorsPlant DiseasesPlants

Identifiers

PMID35589977
PMCPMC9119975
OpenAlexW4280633474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.