Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35589909›Full record

ReviewCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2022

Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

A K M Rezaul Karim, Michael J Proulx, Alexandra A de Sousa, Lora T Likova

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

A K M Rezaul KarimDepartment of Psychology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh. karim.akmr.monscho06@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8762-7126
Michael J ProulxDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Alexandra A de SousaCentre for Health and Cognition, Bath Spa University, Bath, UK.
Lora T LikovaThe Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2318 Fillmore St., San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bath Spa University · GBSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Dhaka · BD

Funding

Advanced Spatiomotor Rehabilitation in Blindness & Visual ImpairmentR01EY024056 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Lora T. Likova · 2014 to 2026
$4.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This integrative review rearticulates the notion of human aesthetics by critically appraising the conventional definitions, offerring a new, more comprehensive definition, and identifying the fundamental components associated with it. It intends to advance holistic understanding of the notion by differentiating aesthetic perception from basic perceptual recognition, and by characterizing these concepts from the perspective of information processing in both visual and nonvisual modalities. To this end, we analyze the dissociative nature of information processing in the brain, introducing a novel local-global integrative model that differentiates aesthetic processing from basic perceptual processing. This model builds on the current state of the art in visual aesthetics as well as newer propositions about nonvisual aesthetics. This model comprises two analytic channels: aesthetics-only channel and perception-to-aesthetics channel. The aesthetics-only channel primarily involves restricted local processing for quality or richness (e.g., attractiveness, beauty/prettiness, elegance, sublimeness, catchiness, hedonic value) analysis, whereas the perception-to-aesthetics channel involves global/extended local processing for basic feature analysis, followed by restricted local processing for quality or richness analysis. We contend that aesthetic processing operates independently of basic perceptual processing, but not independently of cognitive processing. We further conjecture that there might be a common faculty, labeled as aesthetic cognition faculty, in the human brain for all sensory aesthetics albeit other parts of the brain can also be activated because of basic sensory processing prior to aesthetic processing, particularly during the operation of the second channel. This generalized model can account not only for simple and pure aesthetic experiences but for partial and complex aesthetic experiences as well.

Indexed as

BeautyCognitionBrainEstheticsHumansPerceptionAestheticsAffectAttentionBeauty-dependentBlindnessCognitionCrossmodalDissociationIndependenceModalityNeural substratesNonvisualPerceptionTask-dependentTop-down, Bottom-upVisual

Identifiers

PMID35589909
PMCPMC10159614
OpenAlexW4280621168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.