Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35589826›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2022

Explicit knowledge of task structure is a primary determinant of human model-based action.

Pedro Castro-Rodrigues, Thomas Akam, Ivar Snorasson, Marta Camacho, Vitor Paixão, Ana Maia, J Bernardo Barahona-Corrêa, Peter Dayan, H Blair Simpson, Rui M Costa and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Disentangling the Component Processes in Complex Planning Impairments Following Ventromedial Prefrontal Lesions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Memory for rewards guides retrieval.Communications psychology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Active inference and the two-step task.Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pedro Castro-Rodrigues *Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Thomas Akam *Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1810-0494
Ivar SnorassonCenter for Obsessive-Compulsive & Related Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5979-3151
Marta CamachoChampalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Vitor PaixãoChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3722-0747
Ana MaiaChampalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
J Bernardo Barahona-CorrêaChampalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8558-3126
Peter DayanMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3476-1839
H Blair SimpsonCenter for Obsessive-Compulsive & Related Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Rui M CostaChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Albino J Oliveira-MaiaChampalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. albino.maia@neuro.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5071-3007

Funding

European Research Council 950357Wellcome Trust 096193Wellcome Trust 202831Wellcome Trust 214314/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explicit information obtained through instruction profoundly shapes human choice behaviour. However, this has been studied in computationally simple tasks, and it is unknown how model-based and model-free systems, respectively generating goal-directed and habitual actions, are affected by the absence or presence of instructions. We assessed behaviour in a variant of a computationally more complex decision-making task, before and after providing information about task structure, both in healthy volunteers and in individuals suffering from obsessive-compulsive or other disorders. Initial behaviour was model-free, with rewards directly reinforcing preceding actions. Model-based control, employing predictions of states resulting from each action, emerged with experience in a minority of participants, and less in those with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Providing task structure information strongly increased model-based control, similarly across all groups. Thus, in humans, explicit task structural knowledge is a primary determinant of model-based reinforcement learning and is most readily acquired from instruction rather than experience.

Indexed as

Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderReinforcement, PsychologyHumansKnowledgeMotivationReward

Identifiers

PMID35589826
PMCPMC7613376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.