Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35589817›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Torsional wave elastography to assess the mechanical properties of the cornea.

Jorge Torres, Inas H Faris, Antonio Callejas, Felisa Reyes-Ortega, Juan Melchor, Miguel Gonzalez-Andrades, Guillermo Rus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jorge TorresUltrasonics Lab (TEP-959), Department of Structural Mechanics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Inas H FarisUltrasonics Lab (TEP-959), Department of Structural Mechanics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. inas@ugr.es.
Antonio CallejasUltrasonics Lab (TEP-959), Department of Structural Mechanics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Felisa Reyes-OrtegaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
Juan MelchorBiomechanics Group (TEC-12), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
Miguel Gonzalez-AndradesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain. miguel.gonzalez@imibic.org.
Guillermo RusUltrasonics Lab (TEP-959), Department of Structural Mechanics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

MECHANISMS OF ONSET &OFFSET OF RAPID STIMULANT EFFECTSK08DA000339 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MED SCIS LTL ROCK · PI GENTRY, W BROOKS · 1998 to 2002
$527k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal mechanical changes are believed to occur before any visible structural alterations observed during routine clinical evaluation. This study proposed developing an elastography technique based on torsional waves (TWE) adapted to the specificities of the cornea. By measuring the displacements in the propagation plane perpendicular to the axis of the emitter, the effect of guided waves in plate-like media was proven negligible. Ex vivo experiments were carried out on porcine corneal samples considering a group of control and one group of alkali burn treatment ([Formula: see text]OH) that modified the mechanical properties. Phase speed was recovered as a function of intraocular pressure (IOP), and a Kelvin-Voigt rheological model was fitted to the dispersion curves to estimate viscoelastic parameters. A comparison with uniaxial tensile testing with thin-walled assumptions was also performed. Both shear elasticity and viscosity correlated positively with IOP, being the elasticity lower and the viscosity higher for the treated group. The viscoelastic parameters ranged from 21.33 to 63.17 kPa, and from 2.82 to 5.30 Pa s, for shear elasticity and viscosity, respectively. As far as the authors know, no other investigations have studied this mechanical plane under low strain ratios, typical of dynamic elastography in corneal tissue. TWE reflected mechanical properties changes after treatment, showing a high potential for clinical diagnosis due to its rapid performance time and paving the way for future in vivo studies.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesAnimalsCorneaElasticitySwineTonometry, OcularViscosity

Identifiers

PMID35589817
PMCPMC9120141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.