ArticleScientific reports2022
Reliability and generalization of gait biometrics using 3D inertial sensor data and 3D optical system trajectories.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensory organization during balance and gait in people with and without chronic ankle instability.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Particularities in the individuals' style of walking have been explored for at least three decades as a biometric trait, empowering the automatic gait recognition field. Whereas gait recognition works usually focus on improving end-to-end performance measures, this work aims at understanding which individuals' traces are more relevant to improve subjects' separability. For such, a manifold projection technique and a multi-sensor gait dataset were adopted to investigate the impact of each data source characteristics on this separability. Assessments have shown it is hard to distinguish individuals based only on their walking patterns in a subject-based identification scenario. In this setup, the subjects' separability is more related to their physical characteristics than their movements related to gait cycles and biomechanical events. However, this study's results also points to the feasibility of learning identity characteristics from individuals' walking patterns learned from similarities and differences between subjects in a verification setup. The explorations concluded that periodic components occurring in frequencies between 6 and 10 Hz are more significant for learning these patterns than events and other biomechanical movements related to the gait cycle, as usually explored in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.