Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35589793›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Reliability and generalization of gait biometrics using 3D inertial sensor data and 3D optical system trajectories.

Geise Santos, Tiago Tavares, Anderson Rocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Geise SantosArtificial Intelligence Lab. (Recod.ai), Institute of Computing, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. geise.santos@ic.unicamp.br.
Tiago TavaresSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Anderson RochaArtificial Intelligence Lab. (Recod.ai), Institute of Computing, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particularities in the individuals' style of walking have been explored for at least three decades as a biometric trait, empowering the automatic gait recognition field. Whereas gait recognition works usually focus on improving end-to-end performance measures, this work aims at understanding which individuals' traces are more relevant to improve subjects' separability. For such, a manifold projection technique and a multi-sensor gait dataset were adopted to investigate the impact of each data source characteristics on this separability. Assessments have shown it is hard to distinguish individuals based only on their walking patterns in a subject-based identification scenario. In this setup, the subjects' separability is more related to their physical characteristics than their movements related to gait cycles and biomechanical events. However, this study's results also points to the feasibility of learning identity characteristics from individuals' walking patterns learned from similarities and differences between subjects in a verification setup. The explorations concluded that periodic components occurring in frequencies between 6 and 10 Hz are more significant for learning these patterns than events and other biomechanical movements related to the gait cycle, as usually explored in the literature.

Indexed as

GaitOptical DevicesBiomechanical PhenomenaBiometryHumansReproducibility of ResultsWalking

Identifiers

PMID35589793
PMCPMC9120026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.