Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35589673›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2023

A probabilistic epidemiological model for infectious diseases: The case of COVID-19 at global-level.

Heitor Oliveira Duarte, Paulo Gabriel Siqueira, Alexandre Calumbi Antunes Oliveira, Márcio das Chagas Moura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A probabilistic epidemiological model for infectious diseases: The case of COVID-19 at global-level.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heitor Oliveira DuarteDepartamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Coordenação de Engenharia Naval, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5870-5562
Paulo Gabriel SiqueiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, Centro de Estudos e Ensaios em Risco e Modelagem Ambiental (CEERMA), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1839-9879
Alexandre Calumbi Antunes OliveiraDepartamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Coordenação de Engenharia Naval, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2689-1134
Márcio das Chagas MouraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, Centro de Estudos e Ensaios em Risco e Modelagem Ambiental (CEERMA), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5486-2093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study has developed a probabilistic epidemiological model a few weeks after the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic (based on the little data available at that time). The aim was to assess relative risks for future scenarios and evaluate the effectiveness of different management actions for 1 year ahead. We quantified, categorized, and ranked the risks for scenarios such as business as usual, and moderate and strong mitigation. We estimated that, in the absence of interventions, COVID-19 would have a 100% risk of explosion (i.e., more than 25% infections in the world population) and 34% (2.6 billion) of the world population would have been infected until the end of simulation. We analyzed the suitability of model scenarios by comparing actual values against estimated values for the first 6 weeks of the simulation period. The results proved to be more suitable with a business-as-usual scenario in Asia and moderate mitigation in the other continents. If everything went on like this, we would have 55% risk of explosion and 22% (1.7 billion) of the world population would have been infected. Strong mitigation actions in all continents could reduce these numbers to, 7% and 3% (223 million), respectively. Although the results were based on the data available in March 2020, both the model and probabilistic approach proved to be practicable and could be a basis for risk assessment in future pandemic episodes with unknown virus, especially in the early stages, when data and literature are scarce.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19Epidemiological ModelsHumansModels, StatisticalWorld Health OrganizationCOVID-19probabilistic epidemiological modelworld population

Identifiers

PMID35589673
PMCPMC9347552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.