Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35588533›Full record

ArticleRevista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes2022

Clinical outcomes of patients with pancreatic tumors discussed in Tumor Board.

Juliana Ribeiro Silva, Rachel Simões Pimenta Riechelmann, Bárbara Alana Vizzacchi, Patricia Molina, Victor Hugo Fonseca DE Jesus, Felipe Jose Fernandez Coimbra, Fulvio Aparecido Santos Alves, Thamires DE Brito Camargo, Gabriela Aguiar Vicente, Dennys Ribeiro Dos Santos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juliana Ribeiro Silva- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1105-4146
Rachel Simões Pimenta Riechelmann- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0107-9617
Bárbara Alana Vizzacchi- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4264-0626
Patricia Molina- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-2733
Victor Hugo Fonseca DE Jesus- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4702-116X
Felipe Jose Fernandez Coimbra- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5068-0639
Fulvio Aparecido Santos Alves- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2385-1396
Thamires DE Brito Camargo- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-1368
Gabriela Aguiar Vicente- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-3307
Dennys Ribeiro Dos Santos- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7846-6829
Victor Piana DE Andrade- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7064-2605
Genival Barbosa DE Carvalho- AC Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8741-3278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivethe recommendations of the decisions made by the Tumor Board (TB) should be followed to identify barriers that may interfere with the execution of the previously decided, best care for the patient. The aim of this study is to assess whether the TB conduct decision was performed in patients with pancreatic tumors, their life status 90 days after the TB decision, and to analyze the reasons why the conduct was not performed.

methodswe conducted a retrospective study with patients with pancreas tumors, evaluated between 2017 and 2019. We collected data on epidemiological status, whether the TB procedure was performed, the reason for not performing it, life status 90 days after the TB decision, and how many times each patient was discussed at a meeting. We compared categorical variables using the chi square test, numerical variables were presented as means and standard deviation.

resultswe studied 111 session cases, in 95 patients, 86 (90.5%) diagnosed with cancer. After 90 days of TB, 83 patients (87.37%) remained alive, 9 had (9.47%) died, and 3 (3.16%) were lost to follow-up. The TB decision was not observed in 12 (10.8%) cases and the reasons were: 25% (3) for loss of follow-up, 8.33% (1) for patient refusal, and 66.67% (8) due to clinical worsening. The cases of patients with metastases had a lower rate of TB conduct compliance (p=0.006).

conclusionsthe TB conduct was performed in most cases and the most evident reason for non-compliance with the conducts is the patient's clinical worsening.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35588533
PMCPMC10578838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.