ArticleJournal of applied genetics2022
Application of a custom NGS gene panel revealed a high diagnostic utility for molecular testing of hereditary ataxias.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Yield of NGS Tests for Hereditary Ataxia: a Systematic Review.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Proteomic profiling of ANO10-deficient SH-SY5Y cells reveals candidate pathways relevant to SCAR10.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Monoallelic ATP7B variants in adult-onset cerebellar ataxia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Charlevoix-Saguenay spastic ataxia: a novel mutation in the SACS gene.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of hereditary ataxias: a real-world single center experience.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- A Novel Exon Duplication in theThe application of clinical genetics · 2025Article
- Genetic Testing of Movements Disorders: A Review of Clinical Utility.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hereditary ataxias (HA) are a rare group of heterogeneous disorders. Here, we present the results of molecular testing of a group of ataxia patients using a custom-designed next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Due to the genetic and clinical overlapping of hereditary ataxias and spastic paraplegias (HSP), the panel encompasses together HA and HSP genes. The NGS libraries, comprising coding sequences for 152 genes, were performed using KAPA HyperPlus and HyperCap Target Enrichment Kit, sequenced on the MiSeq instrument. The results were analyzed using the BaseSpace Variant Interpreter and Integrative Genomics Viewer. All pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were confirmed using Sanger sequencing. A total of 29 patients with hereditary ataxias were enrolled in the NGS testing, and 16 patients had a confirmed molecular diagnosis with diagnostic accuracy rate of 55.2%. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations were identified in 10 different genes: POLG (PEOA1, n = 3; SCAE, n = 2), CACNA1A (EA2, n = 2), SACS (ARSACS, n = 2), SLC33A1 (SPG42, n = 2), STUB1 (SCA48, n = 1), SPTBN2 (SCA5, n = 1), TGM6 (SCA35, n = 1), SETX (AOA2, n = 1), ANO10 (SCAR10, n = 1), and SPAST (SPG4, n = 1). We demonstrated that an approach based on the targeted use of the NGS panel can be highly effective and a useful tool in the molecular diagnosis of ataxia patients. Furthermore, we highlight the fact that a sequencing panel targeting both ataxias and HSP genes increases the diagnostic success level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35588347What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.