Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35588296›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

A crowd of BashTheBug volunteers reproducibly and accurately measure the minimum inhibitory concentrations of 13 antitubercular drugs from photographs of 96-well broth microdilution plates.

Philip W Fowler, Carla Wright, Helen Spiers, Tingting Zhu, Elisabeth M L Baeten, Sarah W Hoosdally, Ana L Gibertoni Cruz, Aysha Roohi, Samaneh Kouchaki, Timothy M Walker and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting rifampicin resistance inERJ open research · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of Laurus nobilis on bacteria and human transforming growth factor-β1.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip W FowlerNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0912-4483
Carla WrightNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Helen SpiersZooniverse, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Tingting ZhuInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Elisabeth M L BaetenCitizen Scientist, c/o Zooniverse, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah W HoosdallyNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ana L Gibertoni CruzNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9473-2215
Aysha RoohiNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Samaneh KouchakiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Timothy M WalkerNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0421-9264
Timothy E A PetoNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Grant MillerZooniverse, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Chris LintottZooniverse, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David CliftonInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Derrick W CrookNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0590-2850
A Sarah WalkerNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0412-8509
Zooniverse Volunteer Community
CRyPTIC Consortium
University of Oxford · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Using the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Genome to Predict Tuberculosis Pathology, Drug Resistance Acquisition and Identify Community Transmission SitesR01AI146338 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GILMAN, ROBERT H · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI146338Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 200205/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 203141/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis is a respiratory disease that is treatable with antibiotics. An increasing prevalence of resistance means that to ensure a good treatment outcome it is desirable to test the susceptibility of each infection to different antibiotics. Conventionally, this is done by culturing a clinical sample and then exposing aliquots to a panel of antibiotics, each being present at a pre-determined concentration, thereby determining if the sample isresistant or susceptible to each sample. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a drug is the lowestconcentration that inhibits growth and is a more useful quantity but requires each sample to be tested at a range ofconcentrations for each drug. Using 96-well broth micro dilution plates with each well containing a lyophilised pre-determined amount of an antibiotic is a convenient and cost-effective way to measure the MICs of several drugs at once for a clinical sample. Although accurate, this is still an expensive and slow process that requires highly-skilled and experienced laboratory scientists. Here we show that, through the BashTheBug project hosted on the Zooniverse citizen science platform, a crowd of volunteers can reproducibly and accurately determine the MICs for 13 drugs and that simply taking the median or mode of 11-17 independent classifications is sufficient. There is therefore a potential role for crowds to support (but not supplant) the role of experts in antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsVolunteersAntitubercular Agentsantibioticscitizen scienceclinical microbiologyinfectious diseasemicrobiologyM. tuberculosistuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35588296
PMCPMC9286738
OpenAlexW4280579067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.