What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Preparing the Bowel for Surgery in the Era of Microbiome Sciences.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2025
   Review
2. Claudin-2 upregulation enhances intestinal permeability, immune activation, dysbiosis, and mortality in sepsis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
   Article
3. What Is the Role of the Gut in Wound Infections?Advances in surgery · 2023
   Review
4. Rationale for Colonic Pre-Habilitation Prior to Restoration of Gastrointestinal Continuity.Surgical infections · 2023
   Review
5. Association Does Not Equal Causation-Does Thinking You Are Better Make You Better?JAMA surgery · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.