Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35587987›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2022

Law, policy, biology, and sex: Critical issues for researchers.

Maayan Sudai, Alexander Borsa, Kelsey Ichikawa, Heather Shattuck-Heidorn, Helen Zhao, Sarah S Richardson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Double Historicity of Sex and Gender.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Why and How to Account for Sex and Gender in Brain and Behavioral Research.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maayan SudaiFaculty of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Women and Gender Studies Program, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Alexander BorsaDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Kelsey IchikawaHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Heather Shattuck-HeidornWomen and Gender Studies Program, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME, USA.
Helen ZhaoDepartment of Philosophy, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Sarah S RichardsonStudies of Women, Gender and Sexuality, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

GSH Training GrantT32HD049339 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jennifer S Hirsch · 2006 to 2026
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers should be aware of how sex-difference science is (mis)applied in legal and policy contexts.

Indexed as

BiologyJurisprudencePolicySex CharacteristicsSexualityHumansResearch Personnel

Identifiers

PMID35587987
PMCPMC10001427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.