ArticleESC heart failure2022
Phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and effect of spironolactone treatment.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Discovering Distinct Phenotypical Clusters in Heart Failure Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum: a Systematic Review.Current heart failure reports · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Longitudinal phenotyping of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction identifies early- and end-stage disease states.Open heart · 2026Article
- Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction: synergy between cardiac and extracardiac mechanisms and effects of novel therapies.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Review
- Precision cardiovascular medicine with big data and AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based phenotyping and assessment of treatment responses in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- State of precision medicine for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a new therapeutic age.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Treatment options for heart failure in individuals with overweight or obesity: a review.Future cardiology · 2025Review
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current understanding and future prospects.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Unsupervised machine learning to identify subphenotypes among cardiac intensive care unit patients with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Myocardial fibrosis and prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of 12 cohort studies.European radiology · 2024Article
- Multimorbidity in Heart Failure: Leveraging Cluster Analysis to Guide Tailored Treatment Strategies.Current heart failure reports · 2023Review
- Phenotype-Specific Outcome and Treatment Response in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction with Comorbid Hypertension and Diabetes: A 12-Month Multicentered Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Inflammation as a therapeutic target in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and effect of spironolactone treatment.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe aims of this study were to explore phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and evaluate differential effects of spironolactone treatment. METHODS AND
resultsA swap-stepwise algorithm was used for variable selection. Latent class analysis based on 10 selected variables was employed in a derivative set of 1540 patients from the TOPCAT trial. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the prognoses and effects of spironolactone treatment. Three phenotypes of HFpEF were identified. Phenotype 1 was the youngest with low burden of co-morbidities. Phenotype 2 was the oldest with high prevalence of atrial fibrillation, pacemaker implantation, and hypothyroidism. Phenotype 3 was mostly obese and diabetic with high burden of other co-morbidities. Compared with phenotype 1, phenotypes 2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.89; P = 0.003) and 3 (HR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.80-3.07; P < 0.001) were associated with higher risks of the primary composite outcome. Spironolactone treatment was associated with a reduced risk of the primary outcome only in phenotype 1 (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.40-0.98; P = 0.042).
conclusionsThree distinct HFpEF phenotypes were identified. Spironolactone treatment could improve clinical outcome in a phenotype of relatively young patients with low burden of co-morbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.