Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35587688›Full record

ArticleCognitive neuroscience2022

The devil may be in the details: The need for contextually rich stimuli in memory consolidation research.

Helena M Gellersen, Jon S Simons

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Helena M GellersenDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jon S SimonsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems consolidation theory (SCT) proposes that the hippocampus is not required for retrieval of remote memories. In this issue, Tallman and colleagues observe reduced hippocampal-cortical connectivity in recognition memory as a function of memory age, which they interpret as supportive of SCT. We suggest that research seeking to inform this debate would benefit from using perceptually rich stimuli that promote the recollection of high-fidelity contextual details. Tests of recognition alone may not be capable of discerning whether reductions in hippocampal activity or connectivity reflect remote memory retrieval independent of hippocampus (consistent with SCT) or a time-dependent decline in episodic detail.

Indexed as

Memory ConsolidationMemory, EpisodicHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemoryMental RecallAutobiographical MemoryFmriHippocampusMemoryRecollection

Identifiers

PMID35587688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.