Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35587498›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Indoor residual spraying for the control of visceral leishmaniasis: A systematic review.

Claudia Faber, Carlos Montenegro Quiñonez, Olaf Horstick, Kazi Mizanur Rahman, Silvia Runge-Ranzinger

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Claudia FaberHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5208-2971
Carlos Montenegro QuiñonezHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5640-9142
Olaf HorstickHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9873-5686
Kazi Mizanur RahmanThe University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2903-6616
Silvia Runge-RanzingerHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5511-3657
Heidelberg University · DEThe University of Sydney · AUUniversidad de San Carlos de Guatemala · GT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) is one of the interventions to control the vectors of Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL). Different insecticides are used in affected countries, also in the Regional Initiative for the Elimination of VL in South-East Asia. This systematic review assesses all available studies analysing the effectiveness of IRS on the key vectors of VL. The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, with a broad search strategy, applied to seven key databases. Inclusion criteria were studies focusing on 1) Visceral leishmaniasis 2) Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) or synonyms, and 3) all primary research methods. 21 studies were included, five cluster randomised controlled trials (cRCTs), one randomised controlled trial (RCT), 11 intervention studies, also included were three modelling studies and one survey. 19 out of 21 included studies were published between 2009 and 2020. 18 of the studies were conducted in the context of the Regional Initiative. Effects of IRS on vector populations are positive, confirmed in terms of effectiveness and by the availability of studies. Deltamethrin and alpha-Cypermethrin reduce total sandfly counts, and/or Phlebotomus argentipes counts by up to 95% with an effect of a minimum of one month. Prolonged effects are not regularly seen. DDT has been used in India only: whereas in the 1990s a good effect could be measured, this effect waned over time. Two intervention studies, embedded in larger programmes in 2019 and 2020, replaced DDT with alpha-Cypermethrin throughout the study. Combinations of different interventions are not systematically researched, however showing some promising results, for example for the combination of IRS and Temephos. Constant monitoring of insecticide resistancies and quality delivery of IRS are confirmed as key issues for programmes. No human transmission data are available to directly relate an effect of IRS-although modelling studies confirm the effect of IRS on human transmission. Concluding, IRS continues to be an effective intervention for Phlebotomus argentipes control. Delivery requires constant monitoring and quality assurance. Further studies need to assess IRS in different geographical areas affected by VL and combinations of interventions.

Indexed as

InsecticidesLeishmaniasis, VisceralPhlebotomusPsychodidaeAnimalsDDTDisease ProgressionHumansInsect VectorsDDTInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID35587498
PMCPMC9159594
OpenAlexW4280566349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.