Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35587486›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Tuned in to communication sounds: Neuronal sensitivity in the túngara frog midbrain to frequency modulated signals.

Abhilash Ponnath, Michael J Ryan, Zhide Fang, Hamilton E Farris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abhilash PonnathNeuroscience Center, School of Medicine, LSUHSC-New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.
Michael J RyanDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Zhide FangBiostatistics, School of Public Health, LSUHSC-New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.
Hamilton E FarrisNeuroscience Center, School of Medicine, LSUHSC-New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7392-5819
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Multiphoton ConfocalP30GM103340 · NIGMS · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI SHELINE, CHRISTIAN THOMAS · 2012 to 2016
$5.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For complex communication signals, it is often difficult to identify the information-bearing elements and their parameters necessary to elicit functional behavior. Consequently, it may be difficult to design stimuli that test how neurons contribute to communicative processing. For túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus), however, previous behavioral testing with numerous stimuli showed that a particular frequency modulated (FM) transition in the male call is required to elicit phonotaxis and vocal responses. Modeled on such behavioral experiments, we used awake in vivo recordings of single units in the midbrain to determine if their excitation was biased to behaviorally important FM parameters. Comparisons of stimulus driven action potentials revealed greatest excitation to the behaviorally important FM transition: a downward FM sweep or step that crosses ~600 Hz. Previous studies using long-duration acoustic exposure found immediate early gene expression in many midbrain neurons to be most sensitive to similar FM. However, those data could not determine if FM coding was accomplished by the population and/or individual neurons. Our data suggest both coding schemes could operate, as 1) individual neurons are more sensitive to the behaviorally significant FM transition and 2) when single unit recordings are analytically combined across cells, the combined code can produce high stimulus discrimination (FM vs. noise driven excitation), approaching that found in behavioral discrimination of call vs. noise.

Indexed as

NeuronsSoundAcoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsAnuraMaleMesencephalon

Identifiers

PMID35587486
PMCPMC9119527
OpenAlexW4280617632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.