SynthesisJAMA network open2022
Comparison of Amitriptyline and US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Treatments for Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term efficacy and safety of sublingual cyclobenzaprine for fibromyalgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Pooled it
- Drug treatments for fibromyalgia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.BMJ medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Fibromyalgia in cancer patients: a systematic review and clinical implications for integrated care.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Skeletal muscle relaxant for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Regional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of TNX-102 SL in patients with fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pain management · 2025Pooled it
- Management of Juvenile Fibromyalgia: A Level I Evidence-Based Systematic Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of third-generation antiseizure medications and non-invasive brain stimulation to treat refractory epilepsy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Association of Glucose-Lowering Drugs With Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Before Hospitalization for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Pain relief by targeting nonrestorative sleep in fibromyalgia: a phase 3 randomized trial of bedtime sublingual cyclobenzaprine.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Effects ofPain reports · 2026Article
- Cyclodextrin Nanosponge-PVA Hybrid Networks as Supramolecular Reservoir Systems for Amitriptyline.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Sublingual Cyclobenzaprine for Fibromyalgia: Pharmacokinetic Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Place in Therapy.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors in Fibromyalgia Management: An Integrative Literature Review of Clinical Evidence.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the use of different forms of medical cannabis in the treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pregabalin, Duloxetine, and Milnacipran vs Amitriptyline for Moderate to Severe Fibromyalgia.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Review of fibromyalgia treatment guidelines: part 2 - pharmacological treatment.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Case Report: Integrative management of refractory fibromyalgia with pulsed electromagnetic fields and ozone therapy: a case series.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as a Therapeutic Option for Patients with Fibromyalgia.Current rheumatology reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Amitriptyline is an established medication used off-label for the treatment of fibromyalgia, but pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran are the only pharmacological agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat fibromyalgia. Objective: To investigate the comparative effectiveness and acceptability associated with pharmacological treatment options for fibromyalgia. Data Sources: Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov were conducted on November 20, 2018, and updated on July 29, 2020. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing amitriptyline or any FDA-approved doses of investigated drugs. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. Four independent reviewers extracted data using a standardized data extraction sheet and assessed quality of RCTs. A random-effects bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted. Data were analyzed from August 2020 to January 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Comparative effectiveness and acceptability (defined as discontinuation of treatment owing to adverse drug reactions) associated with amitriptyline (off-label), pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran (on-label) in reducing fibromyalgia symptoms. The following doses were compared: 60-mg and 120-mg duloxetine; 150-mg, 300-mg, 450-mg, and 600-mg pregabalin; 100-mg and 200-mg milnacipran; and amitriptyline. Effect sizes are reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs). Findings were considered statistically significant when the 95% CrI did not include the null value (0 for SMD and 1 for OR). Relative treatment ranking using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was also evaluated. Results: A total of 36 studies (11 930 patients) were included. The mean (SD) age of patients was 48.4 (10.4) years, and 11 261 patients (94.4%) were women. Compared with placebo, amitriptyline was associated with reduced sleep disturbances (SMD, -0.97; 95% CrI, -1.10 to -0.83), fatigue (SMD, -0.64; 95% CrI, -0.75 to -0.53), and improved quality of life (SMD, -0.80; 95% CrI, -0.94 to -0.65). Duloxetine 120 mg was associated with the highest improvement in pain (SMD, -0.33; 95% CrI, -0.36 to -0.30) and depression (SMD, -0.25; 95% CrI, -0.32 to -0.17) vs placebo. All treatments were associated with inferior acceptability (higher dropout rate) than placebo, except amitriptyline (OR, 0.78; 95% CrI, 0.31 to 1.66). According to the SUCRA-based relative ranking of treatments, duloxetine 120 mg was associated with higher efficacy for treating pain and depression, while amitriptyline was associated with higher efficacy for improving sleep, fatigue, and overall quality of life. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that clinicians should consider how treatments could be tailored to individual symptoms, weighing the benefits and acceptability, when prescribing medications to patients with fibromyalgia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.