Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35587336›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2022

The new therapy for Alzheimer's disease: from a hope for a few to a false hope?

Stefania Orini, Cristina Geroldi, Orazio Zanetti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Focused Review on Cognitive Improvement by the GenusPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefania OriniIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia via Pilastroni 4, 25125, Brescia, Italy. steorini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5313-8631
Cristina GeroldiIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia via Pilastroni 4, 25125, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-1678
Orazio ZanettiIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia via Pilastroni 4, 25125, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5408-0048
Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the late ninety, research on Alzheimer's disease has been focused on the search of drugs able to modify the disease course. Patients and caregivers waiting for news on this topic, received enthusiastically the advice of the approval of Aducanumab-anti-amyloid β monoclonal antibody-by the FDA, and that of its rejection by the EMA with even greater disappointment. To estimate the number of patients that we would be able to treat-hypothesizing a possible future approval by EMA- in the memory clinic of the IRCCS S. Giovanni di Dio FBF of Brescia, we analyzed 1561 patients undergone a first geriatric visit in January 1st to December 31st 2019. Applying the EMERGE and ENGAGE studies criteria, only 15 of them (1%) could be eligible for Aducanumab. The communication of scientific news should be transparent, more balanced and less sensationalistic, to avoid the rise of false hopes and consequent disillusionment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesDisease ProgressionHumansAmyloid beta-PeptidesAducanumabAlzheimerMCIScientific communication

Identifiers

PMID35587336
OpenAlexW4280529873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.