Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35587300›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2022

Disposition preferences in oocyte preservation patients.

Anne P Hutchinson, Shweta Hosakoppal, Kathryn A Trotter, Rafael Confino, John Zhang, Susan C Klock, Angela K Lawson, Mary Ellen Pavone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Is it Permissible to use Human Eggs inAsian bioethics review · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne P HutchinsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Shweta HosakoppalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Kathryn A TrotterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Rafael ConfinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
John ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Susan C KlockDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Angela K LawsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Mary Ellen PavoneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. MaryEllen.Pavone@nm.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-5543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize the frozen oocyte disposition preferences of patients undergoing medical and planned fertility preservation.

methodsAll oocyte cryopreservation (OC) patients were identified between 2015 and 2018. Demographic information and fertility preservation (FP) indication (medical or planned) were identified for each patient. Oocyte disposition options included disposal, donation to research, or donation to a specified third party, which was decided at the time of initial consent and made available in the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the disposition selection. Secondary outcomes included differences in demographic variables and disposition selections between medical and planned FP patients using chi-squared analysis.

resultsA total of 336 OC patients with a documented oocyte disposition preference were identified in the study timeframe. Patients were on average 34.5 years old (SD = 5.1) and were predominantly White (70.2%), nulliparous (83.0%), with a BMI of 24.7 (SD = 5.4). A total of 101 patients underwent OC for medical FP and 235 for planned FP. In both groups, the most commonly selected disposition option was donation to research (50% planned, 52% medical), followed by donation to a specified third party (30% planned, 30% medical), and finally disposal of oocytes (20% planned, 18% medical). There were no significant differences in disposition selection between each group. When comparing patient variables between groups, medical FP patients were more likely to be under the age of 35 and were less likely to be nulliparous (p < .001).

conclusionThis study shows that oocyte disposition choices are similar in patients undergoing OC for medical and planned indications. As donation to research was the most commonly selected option in both groups, it is time to start thinking of streamlining ways to utilize this potential research material in the future.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationCryopreservationOocyte RetrievalOocytesDisposal preferencesFertility preservationIVF

Identifiers

PMID35587300
PMCPMC9365913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.