ReviewPlanta2022
Genome editing and beyond: what does it mean for the future of plant breeding?
Review in Planta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolving landscape of precise DNA insertion in plants.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Woody Plant Transformation: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas9: a sustainable technology to enhance climate resilience in major Staple Crops.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Enhancing CRISPR-Cas-based gene targeting in tomato using a dominant-negativeHorticulture research · 2025Article
- Genome editing in Sub-Saharan Africa: a game-changing strategy for climate change mitigation and sustainable agriculture.GM crops & food · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing soybean genomics: How CRISPR and advanced sequencing are unlocking new potential.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Review
- Breeding for improved digestibility and processing of lignocellulosic biomass inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Prime editing: Mechanism insight and recent applications in plants.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Functional characterization of transcriptional activator gene SIARRI in tomato reveals its role in fruit growth and ripening.Transgenic research · 2023Article
- BREEDIT: Fast breeding tools to match the fast pace of climate change.The Plant cell · 2023Article
- Unclasping potentials of genomics and gene editing in chickpea to fight climate change and global hunger threat.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- CRISPR-Cas9-based precise engineering of SlHyPRP1 protein towards multi-stress tolerance in tomato.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 Technology and Its Utility for Crop Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The promise of gene editing: so close and yet so perilously far.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionGenome editing offers revolutionized solutions for plant breeding to sustain food production to feed the world by 2050. Therefore, genome-edited products are increasingly recognized via more relaxed legislation and community adoption. The world population and food production are disproportionally growing in a manner that would have never matched each other under the current agricultural practices. The emerging crisis is more evident with the subtle changes in climate and the running-off of natural genetic resources that could be easily used in breeding in conventional ways. Under these circumstances, affordable CRISPR-Cas-based gene-editing technologies have brought hope and charged the old plant breeding machine with the most energetic and powerful fuel to address the challenges involved in feeding the world. What makes CRISPR-Cas the most powerful gene-editing technology? What are the differences between it and the other genetic engineering/breeding techniques? Would its products be labeled as "conventional" or "GMO"? There are so many questions to be answered, or that cannot be answered within the limitations of our current understanding. Therefore, we would like to discuss and answer some of the mentioned questions regarding recent progress in technology development. We hope this review will offer another view on the role of CRISPR-Cas technology in future of plant breeding for food production and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.