ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2022
Experiences with a structured conversation tool: a qualitative study on feasibility in general practice in Norway.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical skills development for healthcare practitioners working with patients with persistent physical symptoms (PPS) in healthcare settings: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Persistent physical symptoms not explained by structural abnormalities or disease processes: a primary care approach to promote recovery.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Review
- No longer alone.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Innovation and testing in general practitioners' practice - the challenging path from idea to new practice.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Article
- The effects of a structured communication tool in patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms: a cluster randomized trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the feasibility of a structured conversation tool (ICIT) in Norwegian general practice. DESIGN AND
participantsA structured conversation tool with elements from Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) was developed for use at the encounter in general practice to increase patient's self-coping ability and the GPs management and sick leave assessment in patients with MUPS. Eight GPs received training and used the ICIT on 49 patients with MUPS. The physicians were gathered into two focus groups. The interviews were recorded on tape, transcribed, and analyzed with systematic text condensation.
main outcome measuresThe aim of our study was to examine any benefit and the feasibility of the ICIT in general practice.
resultsThe physicians found the ICIT helpful to sort out, clarify and concretize the patients' issues. They felt less fatigued as patients took on a greater responsibility for their own recovery and reported a greater satisfaction and better management with the patients. A salutogenic approach gave the physicians greater insight into their patients' lives and their issues, opening for new treatment options and aiding in recovery. By focusing on the patient's potential capabilities despite their medical condition, some physicians experienced that patients on sick leave returned to work quicker.
conclusionsThe GPs in this study reported that the ICIT was helpful in consultations with patients due to unspecific medical conditions and facilitated a sense of competence for the physician. KEY POINTSGPs need communication skill training for integrated treatment and sick leave assessment for patients with Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms (MUPS).•The GPs experienced that the structured conversation tool was beneficial in structuring, clarifying, and substantiating the patient's problems.•The GPs experienced a greater insight into their patients and their issues, opening new treatment options and aiding in recovery.•The GPs experienced patients' quicker recovery and returns to work by starting immediate treatment using the conversation tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.