Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35586932›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Estimations of the weather effects on brain functions using functional MRI: A cautionary note.

Xin Di, Marie Woelfer, Simone Kühn, Zhiguo Zhang, Bharat B Biswal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Challenges in measuring individual differences of brain function.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Xin DiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2422-9016
Marie WoelferDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Simone KühnCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6823-7969
Zhiguo ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Bharat B BiswalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-3500
New Jersey Institute of Technology · USShenzhen University Health Science Center · CNUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

CRCNS: Deciphering the laminar-specific functional connectivity and its vascular and neural correlatesR01AT009829 · NCCIH · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BISWAL, BHARAT BHUSAN · 2017 to 2019
$400k
CRCNS: Neurophysiological Basis of Brain ConnectivityR01DA038895 · NIDA · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BISWAL, BHARAT BHUSAN · 2014 to 2016
$381k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009829NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influences of environmental factors such as weather on the human brain are still largely unknown. A few neuroimaging studies have demonstrated seasonal effects, but were limited by their cross-sectional design or sample sizes. Most importantly, the stability of the MRI scanner has not been taken into account, which may also be affected by environments. In the current study, we analyzed longitudinal resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data from eight individuals, where they were scanned over months to years. We applied machine learning regression to use different resting-state parameters, including the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and functional connectivity matrix, to predict different weather and environmental parameters. For careful control, the raw EPI and the anatomical images were also used for predictions. We first found that daylight length and air temperatures could be reliably predicted with cross-validation using the resting-state parameters. However, similar prediction accuracies could also be achieved by using one frame of EPI image, and even higher accuracies could be achieved by using the segmented or raw anatomical images. Finally, the signals outside of the brain in the anatomical images and signals in phantom scans could also achieve higher prediction accuracies, suggesting that the predictability may be due to the baseline signals of the MRI scanner. After all, we did not identify detectable influences of weather on brain functions other than the influences on the baseline signals of MRI scanners. The results highlight the difficulty of studying long-term effects using MRI.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain MappingCross-Sectional StudiesHumansWeatherdaylight lengthenvironmental effects on the brainmachine learning regressionresting-statescanner stabilitytemperatureweather

Identifiers

PMID35586932
PMCPMC9248317
OpenAlexW4280575491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.