ArticleHuman brain mapping2022
Estimations of the weather effects on brain functions using functional MRI: A cautionary note.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating effects of day-to-day variations in environmental exposure on the human brain: study protocol for the Day2Day Environment project.BMC neuroscience · 2026Article
- Challenges in measuring individual differences of brain function.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Functional brain connectivity changes associated with day-to-day fluctuations in affective states.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Seasonal variations of functional connectivity of human brains.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Individual differences in time-varying and stationary brain connectivity during movie watching from childhood to early adulthood: Age, sex, and behavioral associations.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2023Article
- Individual differences in time-varying and stationary brain connectivity during movie watching from childhood to early adulthood: age, sex, and behavioral associations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Prolonged Longitudinal Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Effect on Striatal Functional Connectivity in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Estimations of the weather effects on brain functions using functional MRI: A cautionary note.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- A functional MRI pre-processing and quality control protocol based on statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and MATLAB.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2022Article
- Bacomics: a comprehensive cross area originating in the studies of various brain-apparatus conversations.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2020Review
- A new virtue of phantom MRI data: explaining variance in human participant data.F1000Research · 2020Article
- Identifying reproducible individual differences in childhood functional brain networks: An ABCD study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2019Article
- Current Challenges in Translational and Clinical fMRI and Future Directions.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The influences of environmental factors such as weather on the human brain are still largely unknown. A few neuroimaging studies have demonstrated seasonal effects, but were limited by their cross-sectional design or sample sizes. Most importantly, the stability of the MRI scanner has not been taken into account, which may also be affected by environments. In the current study, we analyzed longitudinal resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data from eight individuals, where they were scanned over months to years. We applied machine learning regression to use different resting-state parameters, including the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and functional connectivity matrix, to predict different weather and environmental parameters. For careful control, the raw EPI and the anatomical images were also used for predictions. We first found that daylight length and air temperatures could be reliably predicted with cross-validation using the resting-state parameters. However, similar prediction accuracies could also be achieved by using one frame of EPI image, and even higher accuracies could be achieved by using the segmented or raw anatomical images. Finally, the signals outside of the brain in the anatomical images and signals in phantom scans could also achieve higher prediction accuracies, suggesting that the predictability may be due to the baseline signals of the MRI scanner. After all, we did not identify detectable influences of weather on brain functions other than the influences on the baseline signals of MRI scanners. The results highlight the difficulty of studying long-term effects using MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.