Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35586857›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in structural biology2022

Understanding structural variability in proteins using protein structural networks.

Vasam Manjveekar Prabantu, Vasundhara Gadiyaram, Saraswathi Vishveshwara, Narayanaswamy Srinivasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in structural biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sequence Variation and In Silico Protein Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging: therapeutics & biomolecules.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vasam Manjveekar PrabantuMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Vasundhara GadiyaramMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Saraswathi VishveshwaraMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Narayanaswamy SrinivasanMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins perform their function by accessing a suitable conformer from the ensemble of available conformations. The conformational diversity of a chosen protein structure can be obtained by experimental methods under different conditions. A key issue is the accurate comparison of different conformations. A gold standard used for such a comparison is the root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the two structures. While extensive refinements of RMSD evaluation at the backbone level are available, a comprehensive framework including the side chain interaction is not well understood. Here we employ protein structure network (PSN) formalism, with the non-covalent interactions of side chain, explicitly treated. The PSNs thus constructed are compared through graph spectral method, which provides a comparison at the local and at the global structural level. In this work, PSNs of multiple crystal conformers of single-chain, single-domain proteins, are subject to pair-wise analysis to examine the dissimilarity in their network topologies and in order to determine the conformational diversity of their native structures. This information is utilized to classify the structural domains of proteins into different categories. It is observed that proteins typically tend to retain structure and interactions at the backbone level. However, some of them also depict variability in either their overall structure or only in their inter-residue connectivity at the sidechain level, or both. Variability of sub-networks based on solvent accessibility and secondary structure is studied. The types of specific interactions are found to contribute differently to structure variability. An ensemble analysis by computing the mathematical variance of edge-weights across multiple conformers provided information on the contribution to overall variability from each edge of the PSN. Interactions that are highly variable are identified and their impact on structure variability has been discussed with the help of a case study. The classification based on the present side-chain network-based studies provides a framework to correlate the structure-function relationships in protein structures.

Indexed as

Edge-weight varianceProtein classificationProtein structural networksProtein structure comparisonStructural variability

Identifiers

PMID35586857
PMCPMC9108755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.