ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Modified ABCDEF-Bundles for Critically Ill Pediatric Patients - What Could They Look Like?
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caregiver Perceptions of the Transition From Paediatric Intensive to Acute Care.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Current applications and future perspectives of family-integrated care in the pediatric intensive care unit: a narrative review from concept to practice.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Nurses` perspectives on early mobilization of intubated children in the pediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Pediatric Neurovascular Patients: A Qualitative Study of Parent Experiences.Cureus · 2025Article
- The Utility of Lung Ultrasound Scoring in Predicting Post-Extubation Respiratory Support After Congenital Heart Surgery.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Observational
- The Effect of Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation on Postoperative Delirium in Neonates and Infants After Corrective Cardiac Surgery: A Study on Modifiable Risk Factors for Delirium.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of educational program on nurses' performance regarding application of liberation bundle in pediatric intensive care unit.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Pediatric Post-Intensive Care Syndrome and Current Therapeutic Options.Critical care clinics · 2025Review
- Sleep fragmentation in critically ill children: a review of contributing factors in the pediatric intensive care unit and neurodevelopmental outcomes.Frontiers in sleep · 2025Review
- Delirium and Coronavirus Disease 2019: Looking Back, Moving Forward.Critical care nursing clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Pediatric Delirium Educational Tool Development With Intensive Care Unit Clinicians and Caregivers in Canada: Focus Group Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2023Article
- Effectiveness, quality and implementation of pain, sedation, delirium, and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome algorithms in pediatric intensive care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Significance: Advances in pediatric intensive care have led to markedly improved survival rates in critically ill children. Approximately 70% of those children survive with varying forms of complex chronic diseases or impairment/disabilities. Length of stay, length of mechanical ventilation and number of interventions per patient are increasing with rising complexity of underlying diseases, leading to increasing pain, agitation, withdrawal symptoms, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption. The ICU-Liberation Collaborative of the Society of Critical Care Medicine has developed a number of preventative measures for prevention, early detection, or treatment of physical and psychiatric/psychological sequelae of oftentimes traumatic intensive care medicine. These so called ABCDEF-Bundles consist of elements for (A) assessment, prevention and management of pain, (B) spontaneous awakening and breathing trials (SAT/SBT), (C) choice of analgesia and sedation, (D) assessment, prevention and management of delirium, (E) early mobility and exercise and (F) family engagement and empowerment. For adult patients in critical care medicine, research shows significant effects of bundle-implementation on survival, mechanical ventilation, coma, delirium and post-ICU discharge disposition. Research regarding PICS in children and possible preventative or therapeutic intervention is insufficient as yet. This narrative review provides available information for modification and further research on the ABCDEF-Bundles for use in critically ill children. Material and Methods: A narrative review of existing literature was used. Results: One obvious distinction to adult patients is the wide range of different developmental stages of children and the even closer relationship between patient and family. Evidence for pediatric ABCDEF-Bundles is insufficient and input can only be collected from literature regarding different subsections and topics. Conclusion: In addition to efforts to improve analgesia, sedation and weaning protocols with the aim of prevention, early detection and effective treatment of withdrawal symptoms or delirium, efforts are focused on adjusting ABCDEF bundle for the entire pediatric age group and on strengthening families' decision-making power, understanding parents as a resource for their child and involving them early in the care of their children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.