Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35586650›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy of Ventricular Tachycardia Using Tracking: Optimized Target Definition Workflow.

Pavel Dvorak, Lukas Knybel, Denis Dudas, Pavla Benyskova, Jakub Cvek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Repeated stereotactic radiotherapy of recurrent ventricular tachycardia.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pavel DvorakDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Lukas KnybelDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Denis DudasDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Motol, Praha, Czechia.
Pavla BenyskovaDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Jakub CvekDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
University Hospital Ostrava · CZUniversity Hospital in Motol · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) has been suggested as a promising therapeutic alternative in cases of failed catheter ablation for recurrent ventricular tachycardias in patients with structural heart disease. Cyberknife Methods: Radiotherapy planning CT series include scans at expiration and inspiration breath hold, and three free-breathing scans. All secondary series are triple registered to the primary CT: 6D/spine + 3D translation/marker + 3D translation/target surrogate-a heterogeneous structure around the left main coronary artery. The 3D translation difference between the last two registrations reflects the deformation between the marker and the target (surrogate) for the respective respiratory phase. Maximum translation differences in each direction form an anisotropic geometry deformation margin (GDM) to expand the initial single-phase clinical target volume (CTV) to create an internal target volume (ITV) in the dynamic coordinates of the marker. Alternative GDM-based target volumes were created for seven recent STAR patients and compared to the original treated planning target volumes (PTVs) as well as to analogical volumes created using deformable image registration (DIR) by MIM Results: A margin of 2 mm has been found to cover the image registration observer variability. GDM-based target volumes are larger and shifted toward the inspiration phase relative to the original clinical volumes based on a 3-mm isotropic margin without deformation consideration. GDM-based targets are similar (mean DICE similarity coefficient range 0.80-0.87) to their equivalents based on the DIR of the primary target volume delineated by dedicated software. Conclusion: The proposed GDM method is a simple way to account for marker-target deformation-related uncertainty for tracking with Cyberknife

Indexed as

Cyberknifedeformationmotion managementradiotherapystereotactictarget definitiontracking

Identifiers

PMID35586650
PMCPMC9108236
OpenAlexW4225279971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.