Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35586643›Full record

ArticleMedecine tropicale et sante internationale2021

[External Quality Assessment of Thick and Thin Blood Smear Slides for the Diagnosis of Malaria in the Lomé and Gulf Health Districts of Togo].

A M Dorkenoo, K C Kouassi, Y-G Afanyibo, K Gbada, K Yakpa, M Têko, A K Koura, G Katawa, M Adams, M Merkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medecine tropicale et sante internationale, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Pcr-rflp genotyping ofMedecine tropicale et sante internationale · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A M DorkenooFaculté des sciences de la santé, Université de Lomé-Lomé, Togo.
K C KouassiEcole supérieure des techniques biologiques et alimentaires, Université de Lomé-Lomé, Togo.
Y-G AfanyiboInstitut national d'hygiène-Lomé, Togo.
K GbadaMinistère de la santé et de l'hygiène publique-Lomé, Togo.
K YakpaProgramme national de lutte contre le paludisme-Lomé, Togo.
M TêkoMinistère de la santé et de l'hygiène publique-Lomé, Togo.
A K KouraUniversité de Kara, Togo.
G KatawaEcole supérieure des techniques biologiques et alimentaires, Université de Lomé-Lomé, Togo.
M AdamsGlobal Scientific Solution for Health, Maryland, USA.
M MerkelGlobal Scientific Solution for Health, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In sub-Saharan Africa where 90% of malaria cases are concentrated, the control of this disease constitutes a major challenge whose diagnosis by thick and thin smear deserves to be exact and reproducible. The purpose of this study is to assess the performance of thick/thin blood smear in order to improve its implementation process. Material and methods: This was a descriptive and analytical study that took place from May to June 2017 and involved participating laboratories (PL) coming from public, liberal and confessional sectors in Lomé. A set of 13 blood smear slides of variable parasite densities (PD) with assigned values (AV) of parasite densities and the Results: 41.9% (13/31) of the PLs had a compliance rate greater than 80% including four with a performance of 100% for the ability to identify the Conclusion: The evaluated laboratories had insufficient ability for the identification of

Indexed as

MalariaPlasmodiumHumansMicroscopyParasitemiaPlasmodium falciparumTogoEQALaboratoriesLomé TogoMalariaPerformancesQuality controlSub-Saharan AfricaThick-thin blood smear

Identifiers

PMID35586643
PMCPMC9022756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.