ArticleMedecine tropicale et sante internationale2021
[Monitoring the Efficacy of Artemether-Lumefantrine in the Treatment of Uncomplicated
Article in Medecine tropicale et sante internationale, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and prevalence of molecular markers of anti-malarial drug resistance in children in Togo in 2021.Malaria journal · 2024Trial
- Therapeutic efficacy of artesunate-amodiaquine and artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Chad: clinical and genetic surveillance.Malaria journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug resistance remains a major challenge for the management of malaria. This study investigated the efficacy of antimalarial combination artemether-lumefantrine (AL) in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Bangui, Central African Republic. Materials and methods: An evaluative cross-sectional study was conducted between the 15th February and the 7th March 2017 in the Complexe Pédiatrique in Bangui among children aged 6 months to 15 years. Clinical outcome was classified according to WHO criteria as adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR), late parasitologic failure (LPF), late clinical failure (LCF), and early treatment failure (ETF). The occurrence of mutations in the K 13 gene was studied by PCR-RFLP. Results: A total of 55 patients were included. After PCR correction, ACPR at D28 was 97.8% and LCF was 2.2%. Treatment failures were due to new infections. No mutations in the K-13 gene associated with artemisinin resistance were identified. All participants had wild type alleles. The decrease of anemia and fever was substantial. Discussion and conclusion: This study showed that AL remained efficacious and well-tolerated. However, all participants in Central African Republic had wild type alleles unlike contrary in Rwanda where a R561H mutation has been identified. A regular monitoring of efficacy and study of molecular markers of drug resistance to artemisinin is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.