ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2022
The Relationship between Statin and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: an umbrella analysis of systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Statin Therapy on Heart Transplantation.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2024Pooled it
- Statins and Fibrates in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Contemporary Clinical Narrative Review (2020-2025).Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Unveiling Statins and Genetics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Coimbra Eye Study-Report 9.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Association of sildenafil use with age-related macular degeneration: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Bottlenecks in the Investigation of Retinal Sterol Homeostasis.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Review
- Retinal Alterations Predict Early Prodromal Signs of Neurodegenerative Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- The Effect of Statins on Ocular Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methods: Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for articles that addressed the relationship between statin consumption and risk of AMD. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Cochran's Results: In total, 22 studies were reviewed in the meta-analysis that included 2063195 participants and 313702 (15.20%) AMD patients compared to individuals not receiving statins. The OR of AMD in statin-receiving participants was 0.93 (95% CI; 0.83-1.05, Conclusion: According to the results of this study, taking statins does not increase or decrease the risk of AMD development. Therefore, this drug group cannot be considered a protective or risk factor for the occurrence of AMD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.