ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
A Novel CRISPR/Cas9 Screening Potential Index for Prognostic and Immunological Prediction in Low-Grade Glioma.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioma is a malignancy with the highest mortality in central nervous system disorders. Here, we implemented the computational tools based on CRISPR/Cas9 to predict the clinical outcomes and biological characteristics of low-grade glioma (LGG). The transcriptional expression profiles and clinical phenotypes of LGG patients were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas. The CERES algorithm was used to screen for LGG-lethal genes. Cox regression and random survival forest were adopted for survival-related gene selection. Nonnegative matrix factorization distinguished patients into different clusters. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis was employed to create a novel CRISPR/Cas9 screening potential index (CCSPI), and patients were stratified into low- and high-CCSPI groups. Survival analysis, area under the curve values (AUCs), nomogram, and tumor microenvironment exploration were included for the model validation. A total of 20 essential genes in LGG were used to classify patients into two clusters and construct the CCSPI system. High-CCSPI patients were associated with a worse prognosis of both training and validation set (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.