Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35586450›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2022

Noninvasive follow-up strategy after pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Dieuwertje Ruigrok, M Louis Handoko, Lilian J Meijboom, Esther J Nossent, Anco Boonstra, Natalia J Braams, Jessie van Wezenbeek, Robert Tepaske, Pieter Roel Tuinman, Leo M A Heunks and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dieuwertje RuigrokDept of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M Louis HandokoDept of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lilian J MeijboomDept of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Esther J NossentDept of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3854-4137
Anco BoonstraDept of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Natalia J BraamsDept of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-6088
Jessie van WezenbeekDept of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Robert TepaskeDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pieter Roel TuinmanDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Leo M A HeunksDept of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anton Vonk NoordegraafDept of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4057-758X
Frances S de ManDept of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Petr SymerskyDept of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5181-881X
Harm-Jan BogaardDept of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The success of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is usually evaluated by performing a right heart catheterisation (RHC). Here, we investigate whether residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) can be sufficiently excluded without the need for a RHC, by making use of early post-operative haemodynamics, or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) 6 months after PEA. Methods: In an observational analysis, residual PH after PEA measured by RHC was related to haemodynamic data from the post-operative intensive care unit time and data from a 6-month follow-up assessment including NT-proBNP, TTE and CPET. After dichotomisation and univariate analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV) and likelihood ratios were calculated. Results: Thirty-six out of 92 included patients had residual PH 6 months after PEA (39%). Correlation between early post-operative and 6-month follow-up mean pulmonary artery pressure was moderate (Spearman rho 0.465, p<0.001). Early haemodynamics did not predict late success. NT-proBNP >300 ng·L Conclusions: CPET 6 months after PEA, and to a lesser extent TTE, can be used to exclude residual CTEPH, thereby safely reducing the number of patients needing to undergo re-RHC after PEA.

Identifiers

PMID35586450
PMCPMC9108966
OpenAlexW4220652618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.