Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35586446›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2022

Safety of prolonged treatment with bedaquiline in programmatic conditions.

Dzmitriy Zhurkin, Elmira Gurbanova, Jonathon R Campbell, Dick Menzies, Svetlana Setkina, Hennadz Hurevich, Varvara Solodovnikova, Dzmitry Viatushka, Alan Altraja, Alena Skrahina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dzmitriy ZhurkinRepublican Scientific and Practical Center of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis, Minsk, Belarus.
Elmira GurbanovaLung Clinic, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Jonathon R CampbellDept of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-2166
Dick MenziesDept of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Svetlana SetkinaCenter for Examinations and Tests in Health Service, Minsk, Belarus.
Hennadz HurevichRepublican Scientific and Practical Center of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis, Minsk, Belarus.
Varvara SolodovnikovaRepublican Scientific and Practical Center of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis, Minsk, Belarus.
Dzmitry ViatushkaRepublican Scientific and Practical Center of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis, Minsk, Belarus.
Alan AltrajaLung Clinic, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-9871
Alena SkrahinaRepublican Scientific and Practical Center of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis, Minsk, Belarus.
Republican Scientific and Practical Centre of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis · BYMcGill University · CAUniversity of Tartu · EERSPC MT · BY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bedaquiline is now considered a first-line medicine for treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB). We evaluated the safety of treatment with bedaquiline for longer than 190 days in individuals with RR-TB under programmatic conditions. In a prospective cohort study enrolling pulmonary RR-TB patients, we initiated bedaquiline-based treatment at a tertiary hospital in Belarus. We defined standard bedaquiline use as <190 days and prolonged as ≥190 days. We recorded adverse events (AEs) and classified their seriousness and relation to bedaquiline. Our primary outcome in regression analyses was the incidence of serious AEs occurring within 5 months of bedaquiline cessation. We used generalised estimating equations to estimate the adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) of serious AEs between the prolonged and standard bedaquiline groups. We enrolled 113 patients, 83 (73%) of whom received standard and 30 (27%) received prolonged treatment. A total of 2030 AEs occurred during treatment. Of these, 63 (3.1%) were serious AEs occurring within 5 months of bedaquiline cessation; QTcF prolongation was the most common bedaquiline-related serious AE. The incidence of serious AEs per 100 person-months was 5.4 (3.9 to 7.2) in the standard group and 4.4 (2.6 to 7.0) in the prolonged group. In adjusted analyses, serious AEs were no different (aIRR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.42-1.61) in the prolonged group. One patient in the standard bedaquiline group died of acute cardiopulmonary failure deemed possibly related to bedaquiline. Prolonged use of bedaquiline under programmatic conditions appears safe. Clinicians should carefully monitor QTcF interval since its prolongation was commonly observed.

Identifiers

PMID35586446
PMCPMC9108964
OpenAlexW4225361091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.