ArticleJournal of interventional medicine2021
Safety study of Folfox-HAIC in relieving bed restriction.
Article in Journal of interventional medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the effects of mini-midline catheter placement in the forearm versus upper arm of neurosurgical patients based on propensity score matching.BMC neurology · 2026Observational
- Intrathecal pump refills at home or at the hospital: Protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial-The IMPROVE study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Effect of lidocaine pumped through hepatic artery to relieve pain of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Application of arterial infusion ports in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and embolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Saudi medical journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the safety of relieving bed restriction in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and its effects on patient comfort. Methods: A prospective study was conducted. Patients with malignant liver tumors, who met the enrollment criteria, were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. During HAIC treatment, the patients in the experimental group, who were not confined to bed and could get out of bed, used electronic injection pumps to infuse chemotherapy drugs. The patients in the control group, who were strictly confined to bed and prohibited from getting out of bed, used infusion pumps to infuse chemotherapy drugs. The complications of the two groups were observed. The Christenson standard improved method was used to evaluate the bleeding and hematoma of limbs on the operation side. The Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) and Barthel Index (BI) were used to evaluate the two groups. Results: Ninety patients with malignant liver tumors were enrolled, including 53 with primary liver cancer and 37 with colorectal liver metastasis. There were 70 males and 20 females, aged 41-81 years old, with an average age of 61.6 ± 9.248 years old. There were 60 patients in the experimental group and 30 patients in the control group. All patients underwent HAIC. The study showed that, during the treatment period, there were 3 cases of postoperative puncture point hematoma formation in the two groups, including 2 cases in the experimental group (2/60, 3.3%) and 1 case in the control group (1/30, 3.3%). The difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). There were 5 cases of postoperative puncture point bleeding, including 4 cases in the experimental group (4/60, 6.7%) and 1 case in the control group (1/30, 3.3%), and the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). A total of 23 cases, with 6 cases in the experimental group (6/60, 10%) and 17 cases in the control group (17/30, 56.7%), complained of back pain after the operation, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Twenty-one cases complained of poor defecation after the operation, including 10 cases in the experimental group (10/60, 16.7%) and 11 cases in the control group (11/30, 36.7%). The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). During the period of infusion chemotherapy, the two groups of patients had there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of comfort status (GCQ) (88.78 ± 6.705, 78.47 ± 9.519, p < 0.001) and self-care ability (BI) (74.25 ± 9.152, 66.83 ± 6.628, p < 0.001). Conclusion: During HAIC treatment, getting out of bed is safe and reliable and can increase the patients' comfort and self-care ability. Hence, it merits clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.