ArticleGEN biotechnology2022
Label-Free Imaging to Track Reprogramming of Human Somatic Cells.
Article in GEN biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Techniques-A Review on Principles, Applications and Clinical Relevance.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Review
- Optical redox imaging to screen synthetic hydrogels for stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte differentiation and maturation.Biophotonics discovery · 2024Article
- The use of artificial intelligence in induced pluripotent stem cell-based technology over 10-year period: A systematic scoping review.PloS one · 2024Article
- Coexistence ofTranslational cancer research · 2023Article
- Trichostatin A for Efficient CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.The CRISPR journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The process of reprogramming patient samples to human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is stochastic, asynchronous, and inefficient, leading to a heterogeneous population of cells. In this study, we track the reprogramming status of patient-derived erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs) at the single-cell level during reprogramming with label-free live-cell imaging of cellular metabolism and nuclear morphometry to identify high-quality iPSCs. EPCs isolated from human peripheral blood of three donors were used for our proof-of-principle study. We found distinct patterns of autofluorescence lifetime for the reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) and flavin adenine dinucleotide during reprogramming. Random forest models classified iPSCs with ∼95% accuracy, which enabled the successful isolation of iPSC lines from reprogramming cultures. Reprogramming trajectories resolved at the single-cell level indicated significant reprogramming heterogeneity along different branches of cell states. This combination of micropatterning, autofluorescence imaging, and machine learning provides a unique, real-time, and nondestructive method to assess the quality of iPSCs in a biomanufacturing process, which could have downstream impacts in regenerative medicine, cell/gene therapy, and disease modeling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.