ArticleJournal of interventional medicine2022
Comparison of tumor response following conventional versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in early- and very early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Journal of interventional medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Comparison of transarterial bland embolization and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for very early and early hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable for surgery or ablation: a single center retrospective data analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Radiofrequency Ablation as an Initial Treatment of Single Small (≤ 3 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) vs drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) in very early- and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Data of patients with early- and very early-stage HCC treated with cTACE or DEB-TACE were evaluated retrospectively in this study. A total of 40 patients were included, 20 treated with cTACE and 20 with DEB-TACE. The cTACE and DEB-TACE groups were comprised of 80% and 75% males, while there were 20% females in cTACE group and 25% in Deb-TACE group respectively. The mean age of patients in cTACE group was 57.43 + 5.6 years, while it was 56.4 + 5.5 years in DEB-TACE group. All patients had liver status of Child-Pugh Class A and a score ≤ 7 in Child-Pugh class type B in very early- (stage 0) or early-phase (stage A) stages according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system. Results: The Child-Pugh class degradation in the cTACE group was slightly higher than that in the DEB-TACE group. Serious complications like peritumoral parenchymal ischemia were observed in 4 patients in the cTACE group and 5 in the DEB-TACE group. Localized bile duct dilation was seen in 2 patients in the cTACE group and 6 in the DEB-TACE group.No significant variation in serious complications between the two groups was established in localized bile duct dilatation. Other minor complications noted were liver failure, liver abscess, liver infarction, acute cholecystitis, biliary tree necrosis, and mortality. Further, no substantial variation in tumor response between the groups was reported immediately and 1-year post-procedural assessment. Conversion rate to other treatment modalities such as surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or swap between cTACE and DEB-TACE was substantially higher in the DEB-TACE group (40%) than in the cTACE group (10%) at the 1-year completion period of the study. Conclusion: In terms of tumor response, the DEB-TACE group showed a better response, to some extent, as an initial therapy for HCC in the early stages as compared to the cTACE group, and DEB-TACE also exhibited better clinical efficacy in patients with HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.