Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35586197›Full record

ArticleJMIR infodemiology

Themes Surrounding COVID-19 and Its Infodemic: Qualitative Analysis of the COVID-19 Discussion on the Multidisciplinary Healthcare Information for All Health Forum.

Rakshith Gangireddy, Stuti Chakraborty, Neil Pakenham-Walsh, Branavan Nagarajan, Prerna Krishan, Richard McGuire, Gladson Vaghela, Abi Sriharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR infodemiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rakshith GangireddyInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0385-0882
Stuti ChakrabortyOccupational Therapy Rehabilitation Institute Christian Medical College Vellore India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5695-2049
Neil Pakenham-WalshGlobal Healthcare Information Network Charlbury United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-1487
Branavan NagarajanInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0382-9132
Prerna KrishanGlobal Health Academy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7494-2661
Richard McGuireGlobal Health Academy University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6930-7559
Gladson VaghelaGujarat Medical Education & Research Society Medical College Gandhinagar India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-1424
Abi SriharanInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-7050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare Information for All (HIFA) is a multidisciplinary global campaign consisting of more than 20,000 members worldwide committed to improving the availability and use of health care information in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). During the COVID-19 pandemic, online HIFA forums saw a tremendous amount of discussion regarding the lack of information about COVID-19, the spread of misinformation, and the pandemic's impact on different communities. Objective: This study aims to analyze the themes and perspectives shared in the COVID-19 discussion on English HIFA forums. Methods: Over a period of 8 months, a qualitative thematic content analysis of the COVID-19 discussion on English HIFA forums was conducted. In total, 865 posts between January 24 and October 31, 2020, from 246 unique study participants were included and analyzed. Results: In total, 6 major themes were identified: infodemic, health system, digital health literacy, economic consequences, marginalized peoples, and mental health. The geographical distribution of study participants involved in the discussion spanned across 46 different countries in every continent except Antarctica. Study participants' professions included public health workers, health care providers, and researchers, among others. Study participants' affiliation included nongovernment organizations (NGOs), commercial organizations, academic institutions, the United Nations (UN), the World Health Organization (WHO), and others. Conclusions: The themes that emerged from this analysis highlight personal recounts, reflections, suggestions, and evidence around addressing COVID-19 related misinformation and might also help to understand the timeline of information evolution, focus, and needs surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19global healthhealth informationinfodemicinfodemiologymisinformationpandemicpublic healthqualitative studytheme

Identifiers

PMID35586197
PMCPMC9100310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.