Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35586176›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2018

KiGGS Wave 2 cross-sectional study - participant acquisition, response rates and representativeness.

Robert Hoffmann, Michael Lange, Hans Butschalowsky, Robin Houben, Patrick Schmich, Jennifer Allen, Ronny Kuhnert, Angelika Schaffrath Rosario, Antje Gößwald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Seroprevalence, seroconversion and seroreversion ofEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robert HoffmannRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Michael LangeRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Hans ButschalowskyRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Robin HoubenRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Patrick SchmichRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Jennifer AllenRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Ronny KuhnertRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Angelika Schaffrath RosarioRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Antje GößwaldRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the third time, wave 2 of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS), which is conducted in the context of health monitoring at the Robert Koch Institute, now provides representative cross-sectional data for Germany. Completed in 2017, data for the cross-sectional component of KiGGS Wave 2 was collected in the form of an interview and examination survey. Interview survey data was collected from 15,023 participants, meaning that the required number of participants has been reached. A randomly selected subgroup of 3,567 participants was also examined. The overall response rate was 40.1%. Differences in response rates were registered regarding certain sociodemographic characteristics. Weighting was applied to compensate for differences in willingness to participate related to age, gender, geographic region, nationality and education factors. Weighting ensures that assessments of the health of children and adolescents in Germany are representative for the population. The data serves to estimate prevalence rates and, through comparison with the results from previous survey waves, to analyse trends. A set of measures were taken to recruit a sufficiently large group of participants and ensure that the net sample reflects the composition of the overall population to the highest degree. For future surveys, further measures ought to be taken in order to improve the integration of hard-to-reach subgroups.

Indexed as

CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTSHEALTH MONITORINGKIGGSREPRESENTATIVENESSRESPONSE RATE

Identifiers

PMID35586176
PMCPMC8848911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.